Source of mitochondrial DNA.

The source of mitochondrial DNA can be traced to a humanoid feminine female whom is thought to be human 200,000 years ago called the mitochondrial eve. She could not have been human or she would have already had mitochondrial DNA. And then there would be no introduction necessary so what they don't tell you is that the mitochondrial eve could not have been human she would have already had mitochondrial DNA if so. It's astounding to realize even with this information most will still try and deny the truth which is the mitochondrial eve could not have been human. The source of mitochondrial DNA goes back 200,000 years to what they said was a human woman she was actually a humanoid and not a human. She had mitochondrial DNA only she did not have nuclear DNA in her. There are no humans which exist with only mitochondrial DNA in fact there have been no species of animals or subhumans which have been discovered to be having mitochondria only if they were to discover a species of humanoid which had mitochondrial only they could trace it back to a feminine source itself the mitochondrial eve which introduced the DNA to the human race and they also don't tell you that if the human race had nuclear DNA before it came into being it had to trace back to a hominid group or the class of great apes called hominids. Let us suppose for a second that before we had mitochondria we assume what we could have possibly had and there's only one conclusion it could have only possibly been nuclear DNA which would Trace to a hominid group and specifically gorillas and chimpanzees the great apes man would also be included in that group had he been existing but we're assuming that before mitochondrial DNA made us humans it could have only been that the nuclear part of it existed as monkeys or gorillas and chimpanzees to be specific whom had DNA that was called nuclear DNA it's the source of our nuclear DNA which does not contain any original trace of mitochondria whatsoever tracing the mitochondrial would lead us back to an original divine feminine goddess and since mothers are the only one that can pass on mitochondrial DNA it would be proof that a God has existed which introduced to a human race mitochondrial DNA she would have had to mix it with monkey DNA.science cannot discover any of this with a one God religion still all over the place how can a one God religion discover a goddess even if it's proven how can we see it we're busy not seeing it. The source of mitochondrial DNA clearly is proving the existence of an original feminine source of mitochondrial DNA which could only come from a feminine source and it could not have been human again. If it was already human it could not have introduced mitochondrial to us it would have already had it mothers will introduce mitochondrial DNA to their children but we're talking about an original time the first child got it for the first human got it could not have come from a human giving it. Covering up the goddess to try and glorify the god the big lie we all tell ourselves that there is only one God and we also don't know there's one goddess as well everybody knows there's a dad and a mom why are we ignoring the mom why are we saying the mom doesn't exist why are we saying there's only one dad? And why are we not saying that there is not a mom we should be declaring there is not a mom only one dad and that would be ridiculous to do it so let's just clean there's only one dad and not say anything about Mom.