Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index Go to Free account page
Go to frequently asked mystery questions Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index
Welcome: to Unsolved Mysteries 1 2 3
 
 New Mystery StoryNew Unsolved Mystery UserLogon to Unsolved MysteriesRead Random Mystery StoryChat on Unsolved MysteriesMystery Coffee housePsychic Advice on Unsolved MysteriesGeneral Mysterious AdviceSerious Mysterious AdviceReplies Wanted on these mystery stories
 




Show Stories by
Newest
Recently Updated
Wanting Replies
Recently Replied to
Discussions&Questions
Site Suggestions
Highest Rated
Most Rated
General Advice

Ancient Beliefs
Angels, God, Spiritual
Animals&Pets
Comedy
Conspiracy Theories
Debates
Dreams
Dream Interpretation
Embarrassing Moments
Entertainment
ESP
General Interest
Ghosts/Apparitions
Hauntings
History
Horror
Household tips
Human Interest
Humor / Jokes
In Recognition of
Lost Friends/Family
Missing Persons
Music
Mysterious Happenings
Mysterious Sounds
Near Death Experience
Ouija Mysteries
Out of Body Experience
Party Line
Philosophy
Poetry
Prayers
Predictions
Psychic Advice
Quotes
Religious / Religions
Reviews
Riddles
Science
Sci-fi
Serious Advice
Strictly Fiction
Unsolved Crimes
UFOs
Urban Legends
USM Events and People
USM Games
In Memory of
Self Help
Search Stories:


Stories By AuthorId:


Google
Web Site   

Bookmark and Share



Researchers are seeking permission to genetically modify human embryos for the first time.

  Author:  57074  Category:(Science) Created:(9/21/2015 9:56:00 PM)
This post has been Viewed (644 times)

"Researchers are seeking permission to genetically modify human embryos for the first time in Britain. The application is sure to stir up a considerable amount of controversy in what is a scientific minefield.

The request has come from a team at the Francis Crick Institute in London, led by stem cell scientist Dr Kathy Niakan. They have asked the U.K. Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) for permission to use a technique known as CRISPR/Cas9 to edit DNA. This is a cost-effective, easy and remarkably precise method of genetic modification, but some have questioned where it might lead.

The scientists at the Francis Crick Institute say the embryos would be used purely for research only; embryos would be studied for just two weeks, and by law, they cannot be used to make someone pregnant anyway. Proponents say it could lead to better treatment of diseases; others see it as a slippery slope to “designer babies,” allowing people to decide traits of their children before they are born.

“To provide further fundamental insights into early human development we are proposing to test the function of genes using gene editing and transfection approaches that are currently permitted under the HFE Act 2008,” said Niakan in a statement. “Importantly, in line with HFEA regulations, any donated embryos would be used for research purposes only. These embryos would be donated by informed consent and surplus to IVF treatment."

If the application is successful, the team plans to use the research to better understand how a healthy human embryo develops. According to the statement, this could help “improve embryo development after in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and might provide better clinical treatments for infertility.”

The CRISPR-Cas9 technique makes it cheap and easy to genetically modify embryos, which has led to much discussion about the implications of such research. Some say it could be used to correct genetic defects or provide resistance to some diseases. “However, it is up to society to decide what is acceptable: science will merely inform what may be possible,” Niakan told The Guardian.

Earlier this year, Chinese scientists said they had performed genome manipulation on human IVF embryos for the first time, sparking a debate on the ethics of such research. It remains to be seen how the field will progress in future, although some think this latest request isn't that big a deal.

“The use of genome-editing techniques in this context is really the same as using any other method on an embryo that is not going to be implanted into a woman, and which will be destroyed after a few days of culture,” Sarah Chan, a bioethics researcher at the University of Edinburgh, told Nature."

You can join Unsolved Mysteries and post your own mysteries or
interesting stories for the world to read and respond to Click here

Scroll all the way down to read replies.

Show all stories by   Author:  57074 ( Click here )

Halloween is Right around the corner.. .







 
Replies:      
Date: 9/21/2015 10:12:00 PM  From Authorid: 64365    Very interesting read. I can see the good and the bad in it. Thanks for sharing it. Great post. Rated. HUGS  
Date: 9/22/2015 4:31:00 PM  From Authorid: 48250    I cannot see this as being a good thing for many reasons-----thanks for sharing.........T/C  
Date: 9/22/2015 8:24:00 PM  From Authorid: 22721    So do they know if a fetus is successfly modified? And will it be terminated afterwards?  
Date: 9/22/2015 9:12:00 PM  From Authorid: 45906    i recently watched a documentary on dog cloning .... many cheer it on however i found it extremely disturbing the length they have to go though to clone a dog i can not imagine happening on a human, i find this disturbing, i watched them harvest eggs from a donor dog, skin from the dog they wanted cloned break up the tissue and extract the cells needed then once they wipe the donor dogs egg they inject it with clone dog.... then inject eggs into surrogate dog, all very graphic. i find this extremely disheartening they even want to try it with humans.  
Date: 9/23/2015 8:21:00 AM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 57074    I think they're messing with the genetics in the sense that they're modifying their looks. Like if you want your child to be blue eye'd, they'd be able to do it. I don't see ANY good in medicine that clones, or would make humans almost immortal. It's something you should never get into. The life cycle is set for a reason. None of us want to pass away but it's LIFE! It should be accepted. And you should accept your children as they come. It could be good for children with parents who are very likely to have a down syndrome child, little things like that wouldn't be the worst but to take children and make their looks... It's not right. I wonder the same thing. If they can only keep them two weeks, how do you know it worked? Maybe some type of DNA testing? Either way, regardless, messing with changing genetics seems like it could be dangerous in the end!  
Date: 9/23/2015 8:22:00 AM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 57074    DesertLotus, I think they can only work with the embryos for like two weeks then they have to be terminated.  
Date: 9/23/2015 8:46:00 AM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 57074    Oh yes, I can understand that if it's it hard for a couple to have a child without genetic related diseases it's great. I'm all for it. Don't pick your children's looks though. You're not suppose to design those!! DNA is getting wild these days with what we can do with it. Immortality worries me more than anything though. And they are working hardcore on that one.  
Date: 10/13/2015 2:14:00 PM  From Authorid: 67327    I think this would be a good idea if it can help end cancer and other horrible illnesses.  

Find great Easter stories on Angels Feather
Information Privacy policy and Copyrights

Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization

Pages:115 395 408 112 1271 84 275 908 1295 1172 329 798 269 717 1492 1517 288 936 412 21 183 1030 1189 1310 253 607 299 1256 983 307 721 226 576 1230 857 1105 869 1555 1465 1327 867 1573 177 1293 262 1106 827 402 161 533 775 1471 1009 616 1035 1165 918 1127 793 15 785 1468 342 52 224 101 1197 1226 286 769 228 1429 188 1524 179 128 835 150 1397 783 747 1590 355 874 380 170 1377 1527 459 620