|
|
Date: 5/1/2015 1:11:00 PM From Authorid: 22721 She needs to be held accountable. I say both, and instant disqualification for her to run as president. |
Date: 5/3/2015 2:16:00 PM From Authorid: 62722 Breaking the law is breaking the law, and no one, regardless of rank or station, is above the law. |
Date: 5/3/2015 3:55:00 PM From Authorid: 30747 OMG what, in all of history, has any president NOT something questionable? What really bothers me most is the disgusting slander being brought by other sites that would never told about a man, ie he is over weight, ugly, TOO ambitious. They even make fun of the fact that her old man cheated on her. Does anyone realize this how sexist this country is? It makes me want to "peacefully protest" or something. Oh by the way...good to see the king on his throne. |
Date: 5/4/2015 5:45:00 AM
From Authorid: 39179
When being a politician became a career lucrative choice instead of the public service it is mean to be, we kinda asked for our leadership to become ... self serving, up and to the point of protecting their income and perceived power. The concept of 'to serve' has been lost in those who fear that loss for they merely serve themselves at our expense. The greater good of us all thus diminishes. How can anyone fight those who commit such malfeasance when they are the very ones who write the laws and direct the hand of authority? Ask Ghandi. Yet if you want to see real crime...Truly...look at the world of seed saving and genetic patenting. That road leads to an even darker place we will not fully grasp until we are in its shadow. Vandana Shiva..has done amazing work in India fighting for our rights in that terribly applicable issue's arena... its only about our food and our lives...not so much a distraction as silly politicians hood winking us for a dollar. |
Date: 5/9/2015 2:19:00 PM From Authorid: 63194 I'm not saying this out of support for Hillary, but the deleted e-mails were from her personal server, and not from her DOS e-mail from what I understand. Ethically wrong, yes, but legally... I'm not so sure. I think she might have a legitimate loop hole, whether we think that is right or not. |
Date: 6/18/2015 3:54:00 PM ( From Author ) From Authorid: 19092 Maybe...still seems fishy to me. I don't trust that woman. |
Date: 11/24/2015 11:01:00 PM
From Authorid: 26803
given the law... and the fact that she broke it... I don't know what the question is exactly. She broke the law as it existed during her service as SOS and should be held accountable. If she were anyone else, she would be. |
Date: 12/7/2015 5:02:00 PM ( From Author ) From Authorid: 19092 You are absolutely correct Coenlaf, you and I would be behind bars... |
Date: 12/14/2016 9:25:00 AM From Authorid: 61013 She has LIED to the American people about her emails. She claimed she gave them all over, the director of the FBI said that was a lie and they found more. She said she never sent classified materials via that email, and the director of the FBI determined that was a lie. He even went as far as saying there was some top secret documents sent over that email account. How can we have a president who cannot be trusted with classified material? All of that was found on her private servers. Souldrifter, look at rumors started about Obama - he wasn't born here, he's muslim, etc. Her being a woman does not have anything to do with the "slander" as you called it. People bring up stuff Trump said many years ago so why not bring up stuff about Clinton from that long ago? |
Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization