|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| |||||||||||||||
Date: 5/30/2012 12:29:00 PM
From Authorid: 11097
I don't know... I love the legend that surrounds it though. I wonder if it was a creature that died off a long time ago? In fact, if I ever met Big Foot, he better be just like Harry from 'Harry and the Hendersons'   |
Date: 5/30/2012 4:59:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 7849
I love that movie.  |
Date: 5/30/2012 7:16:00 PM
From Authorid: 48250
lol @ my beautiful daughter!., "Harry & The Henderson's" what a great movie! And I agree!  .......who really knows though, We think we have came a long way down through the centuries and certainly for the most part it is a good, positive thing obviously with today's technology., yet with there being so very much to explore, still we haven't even begun to scratch the surface...T/C  |
Date: 6/2/2012 4:27:00 AM
From Authorid: 64514
Well, years ago I'd ask 'Why would anyone run around in a gorilla suit?', but now days people do all kinds of strange things that boggle the mind. Big Foot could be real, after all there are many things on earth we do not understand yet.  |
Date: 6/2/2012 9:59:00 PM
From Authorid: 26598
I got to stop runing bare through the woods and get my back shaved.  |
| Date: 8/16/2013 12:56:00 AM From Authorid: 66777 I know that bigfoot, sasquash, and yetti are real because in the bible it says that after Cane smitten his brother Jesus cursed Cane to walk the earth for ever with a marking that would make him and his decendents different form everyone else. Also that everyone that saw or heard of him would try to kill him. Some people think that his decendents are Africans but no one trys to kill Africans anymore so he not African so bigroot is real. Althought i cant fiwure out which one could be Cane. He could be the Bigfoot or the Yettie. I think he is the Yettie. |
|
Date: 12/5/2013 5:44:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 7849
But we don't really try to kill Bigfoot do we? |
|
Date: 12/2/2020 12:44:00 PM
From Authorid: 16131
This is a hard question to answer my friend but once you see one they are somewhat easy to spot. I would like to say that I am sure that they are real but I am not sure what they are. If you look into the evidence for the THEORY of evolution, there are many gaps that are so far apart that the bridge could never be ungapped between one creature to the next. And there are many humanoid creatures we are finding now including a dog faced human found in a cave system discovered (7 skeletal examples) only about a year ago. You can find it on youtube as "a new human species found in cave". And evolution still promotes the theory by using examples of hoax species one of which came from a pig farmer who made a fool of scientists with one tooth he submitted after altering it and the scientists came up with the way the whole body must have looked and endorsed it as "Piltdown" man. Bigfoot is probably not a relic species of evolution but I think it is likely a nephilim as the KJV refers to such creature. Myself and anyone else that was seemingly credible I have spoken to on the subject of having seen one or more will all tell you that when you see one, you really do not think about getting out a camera or a gun an d they are generally trying to figure you out or trying to show you where you would be better not to go and in some cases draw your attention away from something else. They seem to behave much like native americans did just as peace was re-established been native americans and white settlers. There is a legend that they are lost members of tribes that are now feral and have undergone a form of selective mutation due to their environments. The Patterson/Gimlin tape actually shows 3 to 4 bigfoot if you watch the whole tape before the steadying the camera on Patty. Patty is clearly injured in her leg facing the camera. I think she was drawing away attention from the other creatures caught in the beginning of the film. Now to think of an alternate possibility, the whole group could have been a hoax in what would have been brand new special affects technology that would have had been invented for the hoax that had no marketability so no chance for a return on the investment. The people who have claimed to be Patty in a suit have never said anything about other creatures in the film and when asked have answered that there were no others. Could this family or group have been Tulpas? Monks in Tibet believe that if you believe strongly enough in or give enough thought into something that whatever it is will move from being a thought to a real creature or object. In the way of the tulpa I think it is a matter of opinion if it is real or not. This might also explain the reason people always get out of focus and blurry pics and footage of them besides the times it is intentional to hide that it is a suit. If it is a nephilim, it will have interdimensional capabilities which could be another explanation. But as you can see there is no real way to definitively say "yes" or "no". The question is really not that simple. And before anyone asks the question, I would like to offer an answer. If bigfoot creatures were tulpas then why have people who have never seen such creatures or even imagined them be able to have a sighting or even experience with them. You do not have to generate a tulpa to interact with it. It is simple as the analogy of if you did not give birth to a psychotic killer, they can not kill you.  |
Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization
