|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| |||||||||||||||
Date: 10/7/2011 5:21:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 15228
I remember before they got the supercollider up and running, some scientists were afraid, they thought something that could shake the universe might happen with it...and they were right! Just not in the way they thought.  |
|
Date: 10/7/2011 5:39:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 15228
One scientist was so fearful that he theorized Scientists from the future would travel back in time to stop the collider from working, or something along those lines! |
|
Date: 10/7/2011 5:40:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 15228
Yeah, I often talk to myself. |
Date: 10/7/2011 6:08:00 AM
From Authorid: 5940
I thought this was an interesting read, just goes to show that we as humans are continually amazed at the universe and no doubt there is much more that we have yet to discover.  |
|
Date: 10/7/2011 6:14:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 15228
I'd heard about it, Larry, but didn't totally understand the implications until Krauthammer laid it out in terms my simple mind could understand. LOL |
|
Date: 10/7/2011 7:49:00 AM
From Authorid: 19613
This is just something journalists have blown way out of proportion. The scientists got a weird result and don't know how it happened and haven't been able to replicate it yet. We shouldn't jump to conclusions.  |
|
Date: 10/7/2011 9:05:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 15228
I know DP, the article does lay out that they've asked other scientists to try to replicate it. |
Date: 10/7/2011 11:50:00 AM
From Authorid: 63258
Many of the fundamental laws of Physics break down in the world of quantum mechanics. There was an interesting article in Scientific American about how the basic laws of Physics are only really rough approximations and are really full of inaccuracies. I believe we don't know what we think we know much at all! Scientists think they have a good grasp on all physical occurances and they really don't. Scary isn't it!?  |
|
Date: 10/7/2011 3:19:00 PM ( Admin )
Einstein picked the wrong particle, that's all. Actually it was wrong to pick a particle at all. Particles are "relatively" densely packed quantums of "stuff" that our scientists haven't identified yet. Humans can't detect anything that small. In fact the supercolliders are used to bombard larger particles so we can detect what they break down into. Supercolliders shoot one kind of particle at another kind of particle. When the stuff bursts apart it hits the detectors. Then they try to figure out what the stuff was by analysis of patterns, energy signatures, how long the "stuff" existed before degrading and other measurements. Kind of like shooting cannon balls at small houses and seeing all the stuff in side get blasted all over. Then telling what kind of furniture it contained based upon how far the junk landed, the shape, how long it burned.. lol.. really.. that's pretty much it. Earths best most powerful supercollider is not even close to having the power to break things into their smallest bits. (I call it Theron fibers). Einstein's unified field theory did not include Gravity. Gravity has yet to be successfully included in a theory of everything. His theories were based upon current science and they stand up to the model until smaller and smaller things are discovered. Earth's Scientists believe Gravity is something that exists as graviton particles. That is why it doesn't fit into the unified field theory. Gravity does not exist in a real sense, like cold doesn't exist. Cold being the absence of heat. Gravity is really only the result of the way "Space" is shaped around matter. The term "Space" is really a misnomer (humans sheesh..). How could a Space be shaped? Space is a place where stuff can exist or it can be empty. What if Space is actually what everything is made up of? Then the term defeats it's purpose. The term "Space" as in "Outer space" should really be something that is indicative of Fabric not emptiness. All things are made up of the fabric. Most of what I said, you can research, if your interested. Some of what I said you won't find. Continuing on from here to explain things further will only serve to make me sound like a nut case. I don't really mind sounding like a nut case. But it never ends there. -Rad |
Date: 10/7/2011 3:45:00 PM
From Authorid: 65081
I wonder what ever happened to Tachyons? The particles that can only go faster than light? Very interesting article. Thanks for sharing. Alienmojo  |
|
Date: 10/8/2011 8:39:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 15228
Rad, my brain keeps hiccuping and traveling back to the beginning of your comment at the speed of a neutrino! |
Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization
