Infinite or Finite

There are some days when i need God and there are not other days. We find something out of place with the leverage, speaking dichotomously, then black out the windows. Something is too good to be true.

We call Him a benevolent being but isn't He essentially just a good demon?

We're objectifying love as a possibility that must be supposed fairly a dull thing to do. First, how can we objectify love when the nature of love is "vital"? Although we could say that any form whatsoever can be this objectification which is in theory an indefinite matter. It is a very curious theory.

What exists is nothing and with nothing in existence it would necessarily be that this nothing is everything, everywhere. But how can there be everything when there is nothing?

Because how can nothing be there? There would be nothing there.

Where?

If there is nothing then there isn't anything. But when there isn't anything we have a negation of something which is not a nothing. So it's impossible. Because nothing has an existence and so existence is necessary to nothing and therefore nothing exists.

Nothing therefore is a constant of existence, or in other words, nothing will always be there and we can rely on nothing. This is a natural axiom which in simple terms is related to the idea that we can't even rely on that.

And so something is sure.

This is largely a choice between existentialism and the divine. It may be that nothing is greater than God. But then nothing would be divine. And if nothing is divine then it may be chosen over existentialism.

However, nothing is also existential and oh what a paradox for the existentialists, because nothing is the natural negation (opposite) of something and therefore we can not have something. This is positive.

In fact we currently don't have something to negate: we only have nothing. And negating nothing we objectify it, thus the first idea is the objectification of nothing. How could we negate it?

We could say you can negate nothing because you need nothing to negate anything. And if love is anything then the negation of this nothing to hand (handy nothingness) is of course handy. Because there is never perception.

Is that to say there is never consciousness? But consciousness is nothing. You can't start with nothing because nothing is aware, nothing is conscious. We are conscious of our nothingness.

And with that we thus get a picture of the audacious nature of how to get something from nothing and so on. All we need to know is if it is infinite or finite.

Show all stories by   Author:  62821 ( Click here )