Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index Go to Free account page
Go to frequently asked mystery questions Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index
Welcome: to Unsolved Mysteries 1 2 3
 
 New Mystery StoryNew Unsolved Mystery UserLogon to Unsolved MysteriesRead Random Mystery StoryChat on Unsolved MysteriesMystery Coffee houseGeneral Mysterious AdviceSerious Mysterious AdviceReplies Wanted on these mystery stories
 




Show Stories by
Newest
Recently Updated
Wanting Replies
Recently Replied to
Discussions&Questions
Site Suggestions
Highest Rated
Most Rated
General Advice

Ancient Beliefs
Angels, God, Spiritual
Animals&Pets
Comedy
Conspiracy Theories
Debates
Dreams
Dream Interpretation
Embarrassing Moments
Entertainment
ESP
General Interest
Ghosts/Apparitions
Hauntings
History
Horror
Household tips
Human Interest
Humor / Jokes
In Recognition of
Lost Friends/Family
Missing Persons
Music
Mysterious Happenings
Mysterious Sounds
Near Death Experience
Ouija Mysteries
Out of Body Experience
Party Line
Philosophy
Poetry
Prayers
Predictions
Psychic Advice
Quotes
Religious / Religions
Reviews
Riddles
Science
Sci-fi
Serious Advice
Strictly Fiction
Unsolved Crimes
UFOs
Urban Legends
USM Events and People
USM Games
In Memory of
Self Help
Search Stories:


Stories By AuthorId:


Google
Web Site   

Bookmark and Share



Imus isn't the real bad guy- by Jason Whitlock

  Author:  52155  Category:(News) Created:(4/11/2007 10:34:00 AM)
This post has been Viewed (1052 times)

Imus isn't the real bad guy

Instead of wasting time on irrelevant shock jock, black leaders need to be fighting a growing gangster culture.

JASON WHITLOCK



Thank you, Don Imus. You've given us (black people) an excuse to avoid our real problem.

You've given Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson another opportunity to pretend that the old fight, which is now the safe and lucrative fight, is still the most important fight in our push for true economic and social equality.

You've given Vivian Stringer and Rutgers the chance to hold a nationally televised recruiting celebration expertly disguised as a news conference to respond to your poor attempt at humor.

Thank you, Don Imus. You extended Black History Month to April, and we can once again wallow in victimhood, protest like it’s 1965 and delude ourselves into believing that fixing your hatred is more necessary than eradicating our self-hatred.

The bigots win again.

While we're fixated on a bad joke cracked by an irrelevant, bad shock jock, I'm sure at least one of the marvelous young women on the Rutgers basketball team is somewhere snapping her fingers to the beat of 50 Cent's or Snoop Dogg's or Young Jeezy's latest ode glorifying nappy-headed pimps and hos.

I ain't saying Jesse, Al and Vivian are gold-diggas, but they don't have the heart to mount a legitimate campaign against the real black-folk killas.

It is us. At this time, we are our own worst enemies. We have allowed our youths to buy into a culture (hip hop) that has been perverted, corrupted and overtaken by prison culture. The music, attitude and behavior expressed in this culture is anti-black, anti-education, demeaning, self-destructive, pro-drug dealing and violent.

Rather than confront this heinous enemy from within, we sit back and wait for someone like Imus to have a slip of the tongue and make the mistake of repeating the things we say about ourselves.

It's embarrassing. Dave Chappelle was offered $50 million to make racially insensitive jokes about black and white people on TV. He was hailed as a genius. Black comedians routinely crack jokes about white and black people, and we all laugh out loud.

I'm no Don Imus apologist. He and his tiny companion Mike Lupica blasted me after I fell out with ESPN. Imus is a hack.

But, in my view, he didn't do anything outside the norm for shock jocks and comedians. He also offered an apology. That should've been the end of this whole affair. Instead, it's only the beginning. It's an opportunity for Stringer, Jackson and Sharpton to step on victim platforms and elevate themselves and their agenda.

I watched the Rutgers news conference and was ashamed.

Martin Luther King Jr. spoke for eight minutes in 1963 at the March on Washington. At the time, black people could be lynched and denied fundamental rights with little thought. With the comments of a talk-show host most of her players had never heard of before last week serving as her excuse, Vivian Stringer rambled on for 30 minutes about the amazing season her team had.

Somehow, we're supposed to believe that the comments of a man with virtually no connection to the sports world ruined Rutgers' wonderful season. Had a broadcaster with credibility and a platform in the sports world uttered the words Imus did, I could understand a level of outrage.

But an hourlong press conference over a man who has already apologized, already been suspended and is already insignificant is just plain intellectually dishonest. This is opportunism. This is a distraction.

In the grand scheme, Don Imus is no threat to us in general and no threat to black women in particular. If his words are so powerful and so destructive and must be rebuked so forcefully, then what should we do about the idiot rappers on BET, MTV and every black-owned radio station in the country who use words much more powerful and much more destructive?

I don't listen or watch Imus' show regularly. Has he at any point glorified selling crack cocaine to black women? Has he celebrated black men shooting each other randomly? Has he suggested in any way that it's cool to be a baby-daddy rather than a husband and a parent? Does he tell his listeners that they're suckers for pursuing education and that they're selling out their race if they do?

When Imus does any of that, call me and I'll get upset. Until then, he is what he is- a washed-up shock jock who is very easy to ignore when you're not looking to be made a victim.

No. We all know where the real battleground is. We know that the gangsta rappers and their followers in the athletic world have far bigger platforms to negatively define us than some old white man with a bad radio show. There's no money and lots of danger in that battle, so Jesse and Al are going to sit it out.

You can join Unsolved Mysteries and post your own mysteries or
interesting stories for the world to read and respond to Click here

Scroll all the way down to read replies.

Show all stories by   Author:  52155 ( Click here )

Halloween is Right around the corner.. .







 
Replies:      
Date: 4/11/2007 10:37:00 AM  From Authorid: 27534    WEll Said........!!!!  
Date: 4/11/2007 10:46:00 AM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 52155    Jason Whitlock was just on one of the talk radio stations here, and I just gotta ask Jessie and Al: This guy gets it, why don't you?  
Date: 4/11/2007 10:48:00 AM  From Authorid: 27534    Eddo that was exactly my point the other day. And it is better said from this man and this media than anyone like myself could say it.  
Date: 4/11/2007 10:54:00 AM  From Authorid: 53284    We live in a society that promotes being a victim. If all people had to be responsible for themselves where would we find the victims?  
Date: 4/11/2007 11:21:00 AM  From Authorid: 63319    Eddo, this is a great post and I agree with you about alot of it. With that being said, why do black people think they have the right to say harsh words against the white race, but a white person even say one word out of the way and its all war. Have you ever heard a white man get mad at a black person for calling him flithy name? I think not. I have heard so many black comedians making fun of whites and yes, your right they have also made fun of there own race. This is my point of view. Your friend, Sabiebaby._.  
Date: 4/11/2007 11:41:00 AM  From Authorid: 40350    Very well thought out and you can't really argue with it. Logical and it makes sense. Thanks for posting. *hug*  
Date: 4/11/2007 11:55:00 AM  From Authorid: 14464    This is so true. Also SabieBaby you have a good point there that they so poke a lot of fun at white's and use harsh words, but think about it if we made a fuss like they are doing we'd be considered racists.  
Date: 4/11/2007 11:57:00 AM  From Authorid: 47218    Forget this guy. Anyone who doesn't get Dave Chappelle can't be reliable.  
Date: 4/11/2007 12:00:00 PM  From Authorid: 64414    Awesome!!!  
Date: 4/11/2007 12:22:00 PM  From Authorid: 63319    That's exactly what I meant Ghost Lover. They would be calling us the hipocrits then.  
Date: 4/11/2007 1:46:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 52155    "doesn't get Dave Chappelle?" I don't understand what you mean Mollycat. ??  
Date: 4/11/2007 1:48:00 PM  From Authorid: 2030    And Dave Chappele is the messiah or something? And his word must be understood and obeyed?  
Date: 4/11/2007 3:11:00 PM  From Authorid: 47218    Dave Chapelle is witty and provocative, makes insightful observations about race relations, and, above all, is freakin funny. Don Imus is a dumb shock-jock who made a lame-headed, racist remark sheerly for the fact that being controversial and obnoxious gets him ratings. As said, I don't count much for someone who can't appreciate the difference.  
Date: 4/11/2007 3:14:00 PM  From Authorid: 19586    I listened to a radio show that talked about this. They had a lot to say about Al Sharpton. It is amazing what a hypocrit the man is.  
Date: 4/11/2007 3:57:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 52155    Mollycat, do you really think that Dave Chappelle doesn't make "racist remarks sheerly for the fact that being controversial and obnoxious gets him ratings"? And besides, that wasn't this authors point- His point was that Chappelle gets heralded as a genius for making fun of race relations, while Imus is getting blasted for what he said, which in the grand scheme of things is much less offensive than much of what appears on Chappelle's show. The major difference? Chappele is black (and apparently ok for him to say words like "ho" while Imus is white (where saying "ho" is derogatory to black women.) Double standard? Yes. That is part of what this author is saying.  
Date: 4/11/2007 4:11:00 PM  From Authorid: 47218    No he doesn't. He makes provocative observations about race and racial relations. On the other hand, remarks like the one made by Don Imus in the above story are blunt attempts at drawing attention. "Nappy-headed hos"-- how much thought is required to make a dumb insult like this? Not much. Decidedly non-genius like. This is the distinction between Imus and Chapelle, not that one is black and one is white.  
Date: 4/11/2007 5:10:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 52155    the intent of both Chapelle and Imus is to gain ratings (and thus money,) and both use shock to do so.  
Date: 4/11/2007 5:38:00 PM  From Authorid: 47218    Wrong. Chapelle uses humor and insight. Imus uses blunt shock. Also, I'm quite sure Dave Chapelle has other motivations than money. Otherwise, he wouldn't have turned down 50 million dollars to go back to doing standup in clubs.  
Date: 4/11/2007 6:21:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 52155    BCAR was right, Chappelle must be the messiah...  
Date: 4/12/2007 8:55:00 AM  From Authorid: 2030    Dave Chappelle was out on a boat off the Florida keys getting high with friends and fell overboard. He simply got up and walked to shore. (muttering wise an witty comments about Ho's crackers, and nappy heads)  
Date: 4/12/2007 10:11:00 AM  From Authorid: 18155    Well spoken. Let one who not spoken or thought something negative of another cast the first stone.  
Date: 4/12/2007 10:13:00 AM  From Authorid: 27534    Eddo.....I enjoyed reading IMUS' comments today now that the Duke players are exonerated as to when Sharpton is going to apologize......  
Date: 4/12/2007 10:33:00 AM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 52155    I am waiting for that as well Wise. I suspect we will both be waiting an awful long time though...  
Date: 4/12/2007 2:35:00 PM  From Authorid: 54570    Very Very well said!!! Amen to every bit of it  
Date: 4/12/2007 3:06:00 PM  From Authorid: 47218    No he isn't the messiah. But if you think a blunt comment about nappy headed ho's is on par with what he does, then you don't get it.  
Date: 4/12/2007 4:14:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 52155    I do get it Mollycat, you seem to be the one missing the point here: If Chapelle had been the one to call these young women "nappy headed ho's" no-one would have batted an eye about it. but an old white guy does it, and many want his head on a stick...  
Date: 4/12/2007 6:10:00 PM  From Authorid: 47218    No, the point is that he wouldn't say that in the first place...unless it was ironic or part of some sort of social commentary. Not just as a dumb insult. That's the difference between the two.  
Date: 4/12/2007 8:12:00 PM  From Authorid: 9130    Wow, that was an excellent article.  
Date: 4/12/2007 9:33:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 52155    in the context and tone of voice that Imus used, personally I feel that he was making a social commentary as well. It just didn't go over like he intended. and "ho" is most definitely in Dave Chapelles vocabulary...  
Date: 4/13/2007 8:07:00 AM  From Authorid: 2030    MollyCat who do you think Imus is if not a performer and entertainer? Just like his holiness dave Chapell. I get it just fine.  

Find great Easter stories on Angels Feather
Information Privacy policy and Copyrights

Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization

Pages:743 436 911 1530 1043 1493 274 1034 543 1354 1207 288 224 779 1530 728 1480 885 1191 609 844 1371 1190 1431 1114 747 1304 367 477 153 1410 682 1232 1186 13 164 1319 929 1168 743 642 171 1008 924 1394 834 268 1404 781 597 1207 1500 149 723 139 776 108 1482 1151 1066 857 1179 1435 899 1308 373 1006 1524 215 108 34 536 892 537 1364 300 346 1544 641 775 1195 570 840 743 1598 442 1585 1029 1577 1592