Date: 4/11/2007 10:37:00 AM
From Authorid: 27534
WEll Said........!!!! |
Date: 4/11/2007 10:46:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 52155
Jason Whitlock was just on one of the talk radio stations here, and I just gotta ask Jessie and Al: This guy gets it, why don't you? |
Date: 4/11/2007 10:48:00 AM
From Authorid: 27534
Eddo that was exactly my point the other day. And it is better said from this man and this media than anyone like myself could say it. |
Date: 4/11/2007 10:54:00 AM
From Authorid: 53284
We live in a society that promotes being a victim. If all people had to be responsible for themselves where would we find the victims? |
Date: 4/11/2007 11:21:00 AM
From Authorid: 63319
Eddo, this is a great post and I agree with you about alot of it. With that being said, why do black people think they have the right to say harsh words against the white race, but a white person even say one word out of the way and its all war. Have you ever heard a white man get mad at a black person for calling him flithy name? I think not. I have heard so many black comedians making fun of whites and yes, your right they have also made fun of there own race. This is my point of view. Your friend, Sabiebaby._. |
Date: 4/11/2007 11:41:00 AM
From Authorid: 40350
Very well thought out and you can't really argue with it. Logical and it makes sense. Thanks for posting. *hug* |
Date: 4/11/2007 11:55:00 AM
From Authorid: 14464
This is so true. Also SabieBaby you have a good point there that they so poke a lot of fun at white's and use harsh words, but think about it if we made a fuss like they are doing we'd be considered racists. |
Date: 4/11/2007 11:57:00 AM
From Authorid: 47218
Forget this guy. Anyone who doesn't get Dave Chappelle can't be reliable. |
Date: 4/11/2007 12:00:00 PM
From Authorid: 64414
Awesome!!! |
Date: 4/11/2007 12:22:00 PM
From Authorid: 63319
That's exactly what I meant Ghost Lover. They would be calling us the hipocrits then. |
Date: 4/11/2007 1:46:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 52155
"doesn't get Dave Chappelle?" I don't understand what you mean Mollycat. ?? |
Date: 4/11/2007 1:48:00 PM
From Authorid: 2030
And Dave Chappele is the messiah or something? And his word must be understood and obeyed? |
Date: 4/11/2007 3:11:00 PM
From Authorid: 47218
Dave Chapelle is witty and provocative, makes insightful observations about race relations, and, above all, is freakin funny. Don Imus is a dumb shock-jock who made a lame-headed, racist remark sheerly for the fact that being controversial and obnoxious gets him ratings. As said, I don't count much for someone who can't appreciate the difference. |
Date: 4/11/2007 3:14:00 PM
From Authorid: 19586
I listened to a radio show that talked about this. They had a lot to say about Al Sharpton. It is amazing what a hypocrit the man is. |
Date: 4/11/2007 3:57:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 52155
Mollycat, do you really think that Dave Chappelle doesn't make "racist remarks sheerly for the fact that being controversial and obnoxious gets him ratings"? And besides, that wasn't this authors point- His point was that Chappelle gets heralded as a genius for making fun of race relations, while Imus is getting blasted for what he said, which in the grand scheme of things is much less offensive than much of what appears on Chappelle's show. The major difference? Chappele is black (and apparently ok for him to say words like "ho" while Imus is white (where saying "ho" is derogatory to black women.) Double standard? Yes. That is part of what this author is saying. |
Date: 4/11/2007 4:11:00 PM
From Authorid: 47218
No he doesn't. He makes provocative observations about race and racial relations. On the other hand, remarks like the one made by Don Imus in the above story are blunt attempts at drawing attention. "Nappy-headed hos"-- how much thought is required to make a dumb insult like this? Not much. Decidedly non-genius like. This is the distinction between Imus and Chapelle, not that one is black and one is white. |
Date: 4/11/2007 5:10:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 52155
the intent of both Chapelle and Imus is to gain ratings (and thus money,) and both use shock to do so. |
Date: 4/11/2007 5:38:00 PM
From Authorid: 47218
Wrong. Chapelle uses humor and insight. Imus uses blunt shock. Also, I'm quite sure Dave Chapelle has other motivations than money. Otherwise, he wouldn't have turned down 50 million dollars to go back to doing standup in clubs. |
Date: 4/11/2007 6:21:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 52155
BCAR was right, Chappelle must be the messiah... |
Date: 4/12/2007 8:55:00 AM
From Authorid: 2030
Dave Chappelle was out on a boat off the Florida keys getting high with friends and fell overboard. He simply got up and walked to shore. (muttering wise an witty comments about Ho's crackers, and nappy heads) |
Date: 4/12/2007 10:11:00 AM
From Authorid: 18155
Well spoken. Let one who not spoken or thought something negative of another cast the first stone. |
Date: 4/12/2007 10:13:00 AM
From Authorid: 27534
Eddo.....I enjoyed reading IMUS' comments today now that the Duke players are exonerated as to when Sharpton is going to apologize...... |
Date: 4/12/2007 10:33:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 52155
I am waiting for that as well Wise. I suspect we will both be waiting an awful long time though... |
Date: 4/12/2007 2:35:00 PM
From Authorid: 54570
Very Very well said!!! Amen to every bit of it |
Date: 4/12/2007 3:06:00 PM
From Authorid: 47218
No he isn't the messiah. But if you think a blunt comment about nappy headed ho's is on par with what he does, then you don't get it. |
Date: 4/12/2007 4:14:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 52155
I do get it Mollycat, you seem to be the one missing the point here: If Chapelle had been the one to call these young women "nappy headed ho's" no-one would have batted an eye about it. but an old white guy does it, and many want his head on a stick... |
Date: 4/12/2007 6:10:00 PM
From Authorid: 47218
No, the point is that he wouldn't say that in the first place...unless it was ironic or part of some sort of social commentary. Not just as a dumb insult. That's the difference between the two. |
Date: 4/12/2007 8:12:00 PM
From Authorid: 9130
Wow, that was an excellent article. |
Date: 4/12/2007 9:33:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 52155
in the context and tone of voice that Imus used, personally I feel that he was making a social commentary as well. It just didn't go over like he intended. and "ho" is most definitely in Dave Chapelles vocabulary... |
Date: 4/13/2007 8:07:00 AM
From Authorid: 2030
MollyCat who do you think Imus is if not a performer and entertainer? Just like his holiness dave Chapell. I get it just fine. |