|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| |||||||||||||||
Date: 10/29/2004 10:06:00 PM
From Authorid: 61977
*giggles* I like this post...You made me laugh!!! (o:  |
Date: 10/29/2004 10:10:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
That's my job...to make a mockery of anything and everything  HUGS  |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 10:11:00 PM
From Authorid: 61977
Mock away!! (o: |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 10:12:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
*flapping faux chicken wings* Mock, movk, mock, mock, MOCK!!! |
Date: 10/29/2004 10:13:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
Movk is Bulgarian for Mock  |
Date: 10/29/2004 10:14:00 PM
From Authorid: 21435
I cannot believe the gaul of that swine. He has got to go down. (If it's really him, that is) Tell 'em about it, SpaceCase. Write on...  |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 10:18:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
LOL!! Yeh, he's just wantin' some attention since Bush hasn't even mentioned him in months...and I'm pretty sure the last time Bush said anything about him, it was that he didn't even care about his whereabouts....so yeh, I wonder why Osama wants Bush re-elected...NOT!! |
Date: 10/29/2004 10:20:00 PM
From Authorid: 53054
interesting....hmm im glad i dont live in america during the voting times...expecially this election!  |
Date: 10/29/2004 10:26:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
Allah hath spoken: Vote George Bush, so that he mayeth lead his sheeple to the slaughter.....  |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 10:27:00 PM
From Authorid: 61977
Vote Bush to make the poor poorer and the rich richer!!! |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 10:28:00 PM
From Authorid: 61977
Vote Bush to keep our troops in Iraq and away from their families for another 4 years!!! |
Date: 10/29/2004 10:30:00 PM
From Authorid: 49539
I wonder how many pretzels he's gunna choke on the next time around? If he is re-elected, that is.  |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 10:33:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
LOL!!! You Guys!!! |
Date: 10/29/2004 10:56:00 PM
From Authorid: 17081
He fears Bush  |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 10:58:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
I just don't get that...what has there been to feat? |
Date: 10/29/2004 11:01:00 PM
From Authorid: 53961
sighs... Osama is a joke if he thinks that he can control the actions of the American people. With our awesome military, he'd better stay up in them there hills, because we DO have the best military force there is!  |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:02:00 PM
From Authorid: 61977
You can say that again Paula!!!! |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:02:00 PM
From Authorid: 17081
The military traditionally votes Republican. In one recent informal survey of the armed forces and their family members, 72 percent of respondents said they favored Bush over Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites). |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:04:00 PM
From Authorid: 53961
Go Army! Go Navy! Go Air Force! Go Marines! Go Coast Guard! and all the allies that we have behind us! Find that sucker and stick him in a cell with his neighbor and counterpart Sadam! |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:05:00 PM
From Authorid: 53961
They both disgust me! Hiding out like the criminals they are. |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:05:00 PM
From Authorid: 53961
<no more Diet Coke and chocolate for me...> |
Date: 10/29/2004 11:06:00 PM
From Authorid: 34912
Actually, none of us know what the tape said because that information has not been released to the public. The REAL news today is that Osama is alive, he is still planning and financing attacks, and he's warning through his boasts that we are about to see another attack. Something's coming and I personally find this 'joke' to be offcolor considering the circumstances.  |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:06:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
We just need a Commander in Chief willing to send our troops after him...and I agree with Osama...Bush hasn't been a threat to him...he has our men in Iraq, not Afghanistan, Iran, Turkey...all I know is Osama isn't in Iraq, you know. |
Date: 10/29/2004 11:07:00 PM
From Authorid: 36704
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/29/bin.laden.transcript/index.html If you read what he actually said he goes into why he did 9/11 and killed so many people going back to 1982, I find nothing about 9/11 or Osama Bin Laden funny or humorous and I doubt the family's of the people who died do either. Call me a spoil sport but this post was in extremely poor taste.  |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:09:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
LOL @ Paula! I didn't get to watch the news tonight, but I watched both Ted Koppel and Charlie Rose bring this information to light, so i thought I'd turn on the light here too. |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:10:00 PM
From Authorid: 17081
http://www.washingtondispatch.com/page2/archives/000610.html |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:10:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
Fellow Ammerikins, its foolish to let reason get in the way of mass hysteria...All is Safe. We are making progress. All is well in the asylum. Vote Bush. |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:10:00 PM
From Authorid: 34912
Well, I'm glad we have an expert on International Intel here. You should be running for president. Since you know where he is and what countries we should level, I say, VOTE SPACECASE! |
Date: 10/29/2004 11:10:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
Ok Base, you spoil sport you, I'm gonna leave it up here anyways...why not...it's a drop in the bucket of poor-taste posts  I still love ya |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:13:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
Come on now...if Bush had put all our resources into capturing Bin Laden instead of Saddam, we'd have him now...maybe...I'm not running for president, just running my mouth...I'm bored and had some information inflame me...call me a flamer, LOL |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:16:00 PM
From Authorid: 53961
Seriously all, vote Bush. I already did - Living in Iowa. Kerry would sit back like Clinton and let him continue to do his thing. We've got the best military there is and they WILL find him and make him pay for 9/11. This comes from the mother, daughter, sister, ex-wife, mother-in-law and aunt of some of this countries finest military people. God bless them all! |
Date: 10/29/2004 11:18:00 PM
From Authorid: 30229
SpaceCase, this is a great post!!!! And the sad thing is, you are right!!! Osama is NOT afraid of Bush, history shows the connections with Bush and Bin Ladens.... Of course they want Bush back in.... love this post honey, it is great and also serves in lightening up the "election mood" here on the site... keep writing sweety!!!  |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:28:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
He also accused US President George Bush of deceiving the American people. "Despite the fact that we are into the fourth year after September 11, President Bush is still misleading you and hiding the real reason from you, which means that the reasons to repeat what happened remain," bin Ladin said. "I never thought that the supreme leader would leave 50,000 of his people in the two towers to face the terrifying events alone at the time they were in need for him." (READING "MY PET GOAT" to the children was top priority) http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/23DAA5DE-7073-4F7A-9109-8C153B41A716.htm |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:31:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
I am not going to vote Bush...I voted for Ann Richards as governor way back when and pulled for Gore...and even though my vote's not likely to count since I'm a Texan and most know the majority of Texans are for Bush, I AM VOTING KERRY!!!! |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:31:00 PM
From Authorid: 34912
So why doesn't anyone ever mention the eight years of Clinton's ambivilence towards Osama? Clinton was the closest to catching him. Thre was hard intel on his location in 1999 and Clinton ignored it. He had Berger pull the plug on the operation. Why? Bush has made a doctrine that any international entities that do no cooperate with international sanctions will be made to comply by force. Don't paly this red-herring game that we were never attacked by Iraq. It's nonsense. The policy is now that any Nations that defy diplomatic agreement regarding arms and alliances to terrorist organizations will be stopped by force. Why is that so hard to understand? Saddam was openly defiant, Intel showed he had WMDs (even French Intel insisted he had them). So what was the right thing to do based on those circumstances? At the same time, the focus has never been turned from Osama. What sensless vitriol is this? |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:32:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
Gail, thank you...I was going to bring up the buddy connection but didn't want rotten tomatoes thrown my way. You healin' well dear one? |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:34:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
In all of this, little notice has been given by the Western media to an al-Qaida declaration following the Madrid bombing and published in full on 17 March in the Arabic-language dailies al-Quds al-Arabi and al-Hayat in the UK. A week after the Madrid attack, the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades, which claims to act on behalf of al-Qaida, claimed responsibility for the bombing and declared a truce in Spain to see if the new government would withdraw its troops from Iraq, but warned that it was gearing up for new attacks. This part of the declaration was widely reported. However, very few mentioned the more ominous part of that declaration, short of excerpts which were reported by the BBC and Reuters. "What is a cause for concern is that half the American people still wrongly believe that Iraq had links with al-Qaida and a hand in the 9/11 attacks" The declaration turned its attention to President Bush, saying: "A word for the foolish Bush. We are very keen that you do not lose in the forthcoming elections as we know very well that any big attack can bring down your government and this is what we do not want. "We cannot get anyone who is more foolish than you, who deals with matters with force instead of wisdom and diplomacy. "Your stupidity and religious extremism is what we want as our people will not awaken from their deep sleep except when there is an enemy. "Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilisation. "Because of this we desire you (BUSH) to be elected." |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:36:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
^^^That is also from Al Jazeera |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:37:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
Sorry PS, Clinton did not ignore it, he felt like he couldn't act on the intellegence due to the heat he was under at the time for his affair...if our country wasn't so fasted and fascinated on the PRIVATE AFFAIRS of our president, if we had just let him do his job instead of scrutinizing his actions and trying to impeach him, maybe he would've been more resolved to act on the intellegence...however, we rhe enquirers were much more interested in exposing him as an adulterer...the Republicans harp about showing the president some respect, but how much respect was Clinton shown. How could anyone do their job properly if they were constantly being attacked by all sides?? |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:44:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
Thinker, thank you for posting those quotes...that is what I heard tonight on PBS |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:47:00 PM
From Authorid: 53961
"PRIVATE AFFAIRS of our president", "How could anyone do their job properly if they were constantly being attacked by all sides??" Yep, that's it in a nut shell - The fact of the matter is, he lied - under oath - When you make the decision to take on a PUBLIC office, then you lose your PRIVACY -Your actions are being watched AND Monitored by many - unfortunately so, but true... He made his bed, in more ways than one, now he has to sleep in it... If I was President Bush, the first thing I would have done is throw out that desk! Clinton left Bush a mess with terrorism threats. Of course Osama doesn't want Bush back. Bush gets serious, while Clinton talks the talk but doesn't walk the walk. |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:48:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
Space, Now would be a great time to show the film footage of Bush saying he "doesn't care where Bin Laden is..." |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:51:00 PM
From Authorid: 53961
Spacey, I think the world of you and I respect your opinion, but this is one issue I won't back down on. It makes my blood boil. On that note, I am going to sign off for tonight. Pray for our President and the military tonight guys. They need our help and support. It's only going to get worse. Read the Bible... Night all - |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:55:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
Hey Paula, no worries, we all have our passions...and all of us have the right to express our concerns and positions, so no hard feelings here dear |
|
Date: 10/29/2004 11:56:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
Paula, you've made your decision. You've voted for Bush. We understand. It's cool. But we KNOW the truth. We really really know that Bush is very very BAD for America. He is a tool; a puppet, for Rovey and others, and don't fool us with his "aww shucks, I am jest one o you'ens; god bless ye heart" fake Cowboy swagger. He's a Texas style politician; and in the "Passing Lane" where nothing or no one can stop him, even the Constitution. In the "Passing Lane" only winning, only getting and remaining in POWER is #1 priority. |
Date: 10/29/2004 11:57:00 PM
From Authorid: 42945
I'm glad I'm not over there and having to vote...we have had enough controversy of our own over here in Australia...trying to keep little Johnny Howard (Bonsai!! little bush they call him)out of being our Prime Minister, but he still got in...and the rot has started already, some of the promises have already gone by the wayside...Spacie!!! you can come over here and we'll vote you in as Prime Minister, and Thinker, can be second in charge or vice versa....now wouldnt that be something....hugs  |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 12:01:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
that would be something alright, LOL!!! I don't want to become president or president elect...too many dirty lil' secrets would get out about my own 'shady' past, LOL!! I don't wish that kind of hype on my worst enemy! |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 12:02:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
hey now, watch what you say about Texans in here, missy! I'm liable to sick my cows on you |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 12:13:00 AM
From Authorid: 24924
Hi Zema. I know.....I can see....I can read....I know that there are sweet, loving, kind and dear people out there like our Paula here on USM. She is very wonderful person. But she is INNOCENT. Let me explain a bit...: I have some friends like her. They are Christians who are the real deal, in that they truly do show love and compassion and aren't pushy. They are sheltered, naive, and truly believe that "just pray about it" or READ YOUR BIBLE will make all the bad stuff and the big bad boogie man go away. They're sweet, and INNOCENT. My heart bleeds; tears...and I want to protect them, yet at the same time, their innocence and naivete is what Lying, scheming, low down dirty politicians like Bush, Cheney, Rove, et al are looking for and pander to! They know just what will zing their hearts.... and like the religious huckster Elmer Gantry traveling evangelist of old, sucker them in. The dear, sweet Paula's of this country simply are no match for that which they know nothing about...that side of life, that side of greed and power, and corruption. Like lambs to slaughter.... |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 12:20:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
Thinker, this is not the place for the Christian debates...I am also Christian, I TRY to be passionate, understading, follow the Golden Rulse, etc, but I just don't feel that voting for Bush or Kerry is a Christian/Non-believer issue...there are Christians/Agnostics/Athiests voting both sides of the ticket...I don't think it can be narrowed down that easily. There is more to it...it has to do with how one stands on war & peace, what news mediums each is exposed to, and how much is in a person's bank account....so many things factor into why a person will vote one way or another, so please, refrain from pointing the fingers towards the Christian factor... |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 12:21:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
I also try to follow the Golden RULES, LOL...I just can't type well in the dark |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 12:30:00 AM
From Authorid: 24924
Space, The Christian conservatives ARE his BASE; his support, and he uses them. It is a very big , very important factor in all of this. If you understand the Muslim fanatics and their teachings, their origins, mindset, you know that it cannot be brushed aside and pretend it has nothing to do with it all. |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 12:37:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
I know, and Bush has stated that God lead him to be president...but I'm just not falling for it, and there are other Christians who see through it too, it's just that I don't feel that harping on it will really change anything. |
Date: 10/30/2004 5:34:00 AM
From Authorid: 10245
I am so sick of hearing about how all this lands on the prior administration. Ther will ALWAYS be a prior administration and part of the job of new administration is to close the gaps and holes that the last one left. If you want the power and the glory... you better be willing to shoulder the blame as well. And so far this administration as been claiming blamelessness on all counts. I want a president who will be accountable for his actions. One who will stand up and say "yep... I messed up. I dropped the ball. I played when I should have worked." Or even "I know this happened on my watch and it's my responsibility" would have been nice to hear. Instead we got this puppet who keeps blaming prior administration and everything under the sun for all his troubles. And WHY in the world is our national security advisor tooling around the country for job security when she should be actually securing her homeland? I hate election time... I'm so glad it's almost over.  |
Date: 10/30/2004 5:37:00 AM
From Authorid: 49101
Oh Goodness... I really hope Kerry Wins...  |
Date: 10/30/2004 6:35:00 AM
From Authorid: 8453
I'm not even gonna touch this with a ten foot pole...I won't even mention what political party I back..**coughs** **d**e**m**o**c**r**a**t**i**c**.......*coughs again...**  |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 6:38:00 AM
From Authorid: 17081
The polls show that America feels safer with Bush than with Kerry. Look it up wherever you want. I feel safe with Bush. Kerry might not defend us if it isn't the popular thing to do at the time. I know Bush will go after terrorists. He has shown that. The democrats are discouraging votes from soldiers overseas. They are trying to discount their votes on minor technicalities. |
Date: 10/30/2004 6:40:00 AM
From Authorid: 48531
"Yep, that's it in a nut shell - The fact of the matter is, he lied - under oath - When you make the decision to take on a PUBLIC office, then you lose your PRIVACY -Your actions are being watched AND Monitored by many - unfortunately so, but true... He made his bed, in more ways than one, now he has to sleep in it... ". Well Bush lied to us to, so lets Crucify him. Whos with me, lets nail him to a telephone pole and flame it.  |
Date: 10/30/2004 7:53:00 AM
From Authorid: 62728
And yet, the tape dropped off at the television station in Pakistan says clearly "“your security is not in the hands of Kerry or Bush or al-Qaida. Your security is in your own hands." Doesn't sound to me like he really cares who is elected. -DeltaRebel  |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 8:57:00 AM
From Authorid: 24924
The glassy-eyed "Bush keeps us safer!" voters seem incapable of grasping: Bin Ladin IS STILL ALIVE. Bush has done the opposite, by providing more reason for a deep and consuming hatred of America and Americans for the rest of their lives. A whole brand-new stock of plotters, planners resistors, suicide bombers, recruiters and fanatics who pray to their god and vow "that you and yours will suffer as they have been made to suffer". Just the other day, Cheney said: "Afghanistan and Iraq will be studied for years for their brilliance." WHAT THE..!!??? Anyone else think this is just MAJOR delusional? 100,000 Iraqi's dead, chaos, Beheadings, Abu Ghraib, no WMD's, missing explosives, a near civil war, and this is "brilliance"? I'd darn sure hate to see what a failure is.. **Cheney is our very own Baghdad Bob** |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 9:02:00 AM
From Authorid: 24924
"The tension of a mysterious danger is even more unbearable than danger itself. People hate the vacuum of an unknown situation. They want security. They even prefer war to the insecure expectation of a war with its threat of enemy surprise. This vague fearful expectation acts on their fantasies. They anticipate all kinds of mysterious dangers; they begin to provoke them. It is the evocation of fear and danger in order to escape the tension of insecurity." -- Joost A. Merloo, "Patterns of Panic" |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 9:16:00 AM
From Authorid: 24924
Yooohoo! ANYONE else smell a rat? Anyone stop and wonder how come Osama comes out with a tape just a few days before election day. Who'da thunk it? For a long time we've heard the wacko right-wingers (Ann Coulter, O'Liely, Pat Robertson, Falwell, etc) claim that a vote for Kerry was a vote for Osama. Then right on CUE.... Osama comes out with a video and says things that the media spins and construes as an endorsement for Kerry. HELLO! What the sam hill is going on, you should be asking. Ummm...... |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 9:32:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
"The democrats are discouraging votes from soldiers overseas"...that's two votes MfromPA, one of my best pals is also from PA...she filled me in on this little issue already..." The polls show that America feels safer with Bush than with Kerry. "...Since no one has bothered to poll me on the subject or anyone I know, I cannot and will not rely on them "Well Bush lied to us to, so lets Crucify him. Whos with me, lets nail him to a telephone pole and flame it." I hope that comment was as sarcastic as my Paris Hilton one on your post |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 9:38:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
Bush didn't keep us safer, he ignored warnings about terrorists on our soil from the time he entered the oval office until the tragedies of 9-11...had he done his job to keep us safe, he would have done something about the problem...al he did was ignore it until it was too late...and that was just in his first 9 months in office. I think that's what most envokes my passions...the single fact that he wrote off the CIA's intellegence report and blamed the previous administration. Instead he could've given his orders to hunt down those murderers before they had a chance to act....he had all the information...the knowledge that they were on our soil and plotting something big that involved commercial flights...but that wasn't enough to get him off the greens or his ranch.... |
Date: 10/30/2004 10:22:00 AM
From Authorid: 62881
I agree with this post...They were saying the same thing on CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, last night. Base may think this post is in poor taste, but this is just letting everybody know how that tape is being interpreted....Green Eyed Froggy  |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 2:18:00 PM
From Authorid: 62728
Well, techinically, it's all Ronald Regan's fault. I mean really. Didn't everyone notice that Osama said he'd been planning this since 1982? I'm sure if we look hard enough, we can find someone before that to blame it on. The bottom line is that people from George W. Bush before him to Clinton, before him to George H.W. Bush, to Reagan have had a chance to do something. George W. Bush had the misfortune of being in office when the attack did happen, and the opportunity to respond. He's done so. History will judge later whether what has been done eventually leaves the world in a better state or not.-DeltaRebel |
Date: 10/30/2004 3:49:00 PM
From Authorid: 47218
I was listening to a terrorism specialist on the radio the other day, and he coroborates this-- his analysis was that terrorist leaders would most likely prefer Bush over Kerry because Bush makes a great scapegoat. I suspect the same.  |
Date: 10/30/2004 4:22:00 PM
From Authorid: 24319
Hm. Thinking outside the box, I think that Osama wants you to THINK he wants Bush in office, and with people knowing that, Americans will cast their vote for Kerry, because that is who he really wants in office. Reverse psychology. And, I am not intrested in arguing with anyone about it, that's my opinion.  |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 4:26:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
Bin Laden said the relationship between Bush and his father, the former president, reminded him of many Middle Eastern regimes: "We did not find it difficult to deal with Bush and his administration because it is similar to regimes in our countries in that half of them are ruled by the military and the other half are ruled by the sons of kings and presidents. We have a long experience with them .... Bin Laden said that when the senior Bush, the former president, visited the Middle East, he was impressed by their regimes. "He envied them for staying in power for decades and embezzling the nation's wealth. So he transferred tyranny and oppression to his son and they named it 'homeland security law' under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Bush, the father, did well by installing his sons as governors of states, and he did not forget to transfer the expertise of forgery to Florida to benefit them in critical times." ==O Bin Ladin |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 5:31:00 PM
From Authorid: 47218
because Bin Laden has come out and said, "Americans-- I want you to vote for President Bush"? no. It's just a matter of analyzing which scenario works to the terrorist's advantage-- with either candidate, Americans are going to continue their occupation of Iraq and their attack on the middle east-- not that Bin Laden and his cohorts really care about that-- that their people are being harmed, that countries are under attack. They are not sovereigns of a country-- an attack on a country is no challenge to their authority. They just move their network somewhere else and their rule is actually strengthened because they are a fringe group who control people through fear and hatred, and American aggression just creates more hatred against us and lends more followers to their cause. Bush is the greater boon to them because he is easy to demonize-- he is uncomprimising, his policies are fairly black and white-- he makes a great villian. |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 10:54:00 PM
From Authorid: 62728
And we're just supposed to take bin Laden at his word. He said that George H. W. Bush envied something and wanted to emulate it, and we're supposed to just accept that as fact? Sorry, but I have hard time taking his comments seriously in regard to Jeb and George W. Bush and the whole line being placed in power, so to speak. -DeltaRebel |
Date: 10/30/2004 11:16:00 PM
From Authorid: 52155
Hey Thinker, why is it that you have extra sentances in your quotes about the tape than what CNN has? and SpaceCase, just where doesn Osama say he wants us to vote Bush?  |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 11:41:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
Eddo, those other statements were made after the Madrid bombing , the timing of the attack, coming immediately before presidential elections in Spain. Predictions about how Al Quada would try to influence this (America's) form of the democratic process were sparked by the train bombings in Madrid last March. I took the quotes from Al-Jezeera's site. I tried to go back there just now, but it said to much demand and try back later; something to that effect. |
|
Date: 10/30/2004 11:53:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
Look at who else wants Bush to win. The Mullahs of IRAN. The head of Iran's security council said Tuesday that the re-election of President Bush was in Tehran's best interests, despite the administration's axis of evil label, accusations that Iran harbors al-Qaida terrorists and threats of sanctions over the country's nuclear ambitions. And if THAT fact doesn't blow your mind and enable you Bush lovers to GET IT....nothing will. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&ncid=696&e=2&u=/ap/20041019/ap_on_el_pr/iran_us_elections |
|
Date: 10/31/2004 1:22:00 PM ( Admin-DNL )
Wow I missed this post. LOL, I am not even going to comment on this But I agree with Mother love "Vote Bush to make the rich richer and the poor poorer" |
Date: 10/31/2004 8:44:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
I heard just the opposite...I heard he was endorsing Kerry for the presidency. I also know that the leader of N.Korea is hoping Kerry will be elected too. I guess they know who will be the least AWARE and who'll be the least likely to CARE.  |
|
Date: 10/31/2004 8:49:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
Carrie...I was saying that exact thing to my hubby today. Osama would probably use reverse psychology to instill fear in the American public, ASUMING he actually said what the author is saying he did. |
|
Date: 11/1/2004 4:01:00 AM
From Authorid: 48531
then again, we dont know what Osama is thinking, or his motives or any of it. Its all speculation. |
Date: 11/1/2004 11:18:00 AM
From Authorid: 19613
But You Choose, what if he's using REVERSE reverse psychology?  |
|
Date: 11/1/2004 1:23:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 53836
YouChoose...you used to call me spacecase...now you refer to me as "the author"...has the bridges burned? |
|
Date: 11/1/2004 1:49:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
I'm sorry SpaceCase, I didn't mean any offense. I sometimes do that when I'm replying to a lot of posts. I mean it respectfully, nothing else. Sorry if that offended you. |
|
Date: 11/1/2004 1:52:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
LOL@ Dark Pheonix...could be? But then again, he's not a deep enough thinker to get that complex! |
Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization
