Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index Go to Free account page
Go to frequently asked mystery questions Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index
Welcome: to Unsolved Mysteries 1 2 3
 
 New Mystery StoryNew Unsolved Mystery UserLogon to Unsolved MysteriesRead Random Mystery StoryChat on Unsolved MysteriesMystery Coffee housePsychic Advice on Unsolved MysteriesGeneral Mysterious AdviceSerious Mysterious AdviceReplies Wanted on these mystery stories
 




Show Stories by
Newest
Recently Updated
Wanting Replies
Recently Replied to
Discussions&Questions
Site Suggestions
Highest Rated
Most Rated
General Advice

Ancient Beliefs
Angels, God, Spiritual
Animals&Pets
Comedy
Conspiracy Theories
Debates
Dreams
Dream Interpretation
Embarrassing Moments
Entertainment
ESP
General Interest
Ghosts/Apparitions
Hauntings
History
Horror
Household tips
Human Interest
Humor / Jokes
In Recognition of
Lost Friends/Family
Missing Persons
Music
Mysterious Happenings
Mysterious Sounds
Near Death Experience
Ouija Mysteries
Out of Body Experience
Party Line
Philosophy
Poetry
Prayers
Predictions
Psychic Advice
Quotes
Religious / Religions
Reviews
Riddles
Science
Sci-fi
Serious Advice
Strictly Fiction
Unsolved Crimes
UFOs
Urban Legends
USM Events and People
USM Games
In Memory of
Self Help
Search Stories:


Stories By AuthorId:


Google
Web Site   

Bookmark and Share



Study Finds it is Harder for Poor People to Stay Thin

  Author: 62410  Category:(Discussion) Created:(12/30/2003 1:26:00 PM)
This post has been Viewed (1238 times)

SEATTLE - Is it harder for poor people to stay thin? New research from the University of Washington seems to suggest so.

"Richer people eat better diets," said Dr. Adam Drewnowski at the Center for Public Health Nutrition. Dr. Drewnowski discovered the link by pouring over government statistics, then putting the numbers together in a new way.

He says the findings really turn nutrition education upside down.

"It's useless to say to them, 'Well you really should be eating chicken, lean meat, and fish and fresh vegetable and fruit because that is not what they can afford,' " Dr. Drewnowski said.

Drewnowski says government and community leaders need to take a look at the cost of nutritious food, and the social costs of the obesity epidemic in developing new resources to combat the problem.

********************************************* I agree with this study. What do you think?

Scall

You can join Unsolved Mysteries and post your own mysteries or
interesting stories for the world to read and respond to Click here

Scroll all the way down to read replies.

Show all stories by   Author: 62410 ( Click here )

Halloween is Right around the corner.. .







 
Replies:      
Date: 12/30/2003 1:34:00 PM  From Authorid: 18928    interesting!  
Date: 12/30/2003 1:42:00 PM  From Authorid: 36704    I disagree, it's cheaper to buy a bag of oranges or apples than it is to buy a bag of doritos. Fresh fruit and vegetables are not expensive. I would say it's more that they see junk food as one of the few luxuries they can afford. They may not be able to afford to take their whole family to movies or go on vacations but they can buy junk food to enjoy while they sit around and watch tv. So I don't think it's that they can't afford the healthier food just that they buy the other stuff as "treats" for their families.  
Date: 12/30/2003 1:52:00 PM  From Authorid: 19092    I gotta go with Base on this one. Plus, today as opposed to times since lost, there is much more "inactivity". We were always very active growing up. Like neighborhood football games, softball, dirtbikes, etc. etc...Today, kids sit around and play computer or video games. Adults sit in front of computers, kinda like what I'm doing now...LOL. We need to get off our butts and get active again.  
Date: 12/30/2003 1:57:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 62410    True true King Caspian, but the poor I think they are talking about in this study are the ones who can't even afford a bag of dorritos... the ones who live on fatty hamburger, potatoes and mac and cheese -- it's all carbs and fat.
Date: 12/30/2003 2:08:00 PM  From Authorid: 59876    that can be true about the fruit, but it is also true that many super starchy foods like potatos, instant potatos, mac and cheese, etc. are dirt cheap. lean meat is not cheap, but fatty roasts and greasy chicken are. all the cuts of meat we buy for this house must be super lean because of my mom's heart attacks. the more you reduce the fat, reduce the sodium, reduce the sugar, the more expensive the bill gets. i can buy a big bag of lays potato chips for a buck nintey nine on sale, but have yet to get wow doritos for less than four bucks. my family eats tons of fruit and we buy it at costco at a great price, but for that priveledge, we fork over a hundred dollars a year. not only that, fruit does not satisfy cravings. personally, i think education and balance are the keys. ever since my mom had her heart attack right before halloween, i have stil eaten whatever i wanted, but i am also extemely aware of the consequences of each choice i made as soon as i start eating it.  
Date: 12/30/2003 2:14:00 PM  From Authorid: 36704    Mac and cheese and potatoes may be cheap but you can get canned vegetables and generic soup cheap also which has less carbs and less fat. Just because someone doesn't have a lot to spend doesn't mean they can't eat healthy.  
Date: 12/30/2003 2:25:00 PM  From Authorid: 33925    Being poor is not an excuse to eat unhealthy. I was a coordinator in a program a few years ago that helped low income people learn to cook healthy meals for their family plus learn to shop within a strict budget and still feed their family the things from all the food groups daily. Fruits and vegetables are not expensive, and even cheaper when you grow your own. As for meat, its not expensive to raise a cow or pig yourself and then have the meat cut for you. It gives you enough meat to last a very long time. You can eat very well on a very limited income.  
Date: 12/30/2003 2:36:00 PM  From Authorid: 40530    I think that this may be true and may not be. My friend is called Emily, and her mother has her and another girl, Frannie, no father helping them out. She has to work and look after her children, as well as shopping and keeping the house clean. She doesn't have time to cook, she has to grab what she can get, which means that these things may be fatty. I know that it's easy for people to eat well with not much money, but they need time to prepare the food. Good post  
Date: 12/30/2003 2:41:00 PM  From Authorid: 19092    I live on that stuff, and I'm not even poor, LOL.  
Date: 12/30/2003 3:48:00 PM  From Authorid: 20497    I do agree that there is an issue here that needs to be dealt with.......... bu there are many causes of obesity........ many  
Date: 12/30/2003 4:05:00 PM  From Authorid: 62023    I grew up in a large family, where dad worked and mom stayed home. There were many "lean" times as far as the money coming in. We did have a few snack foods around, but still none of us were overweight. I think it had a lot to do with activity, and the fact that Mom was at home to prepare home-made meals and snacks. We were always outside playing and not lying around watching TV, or playing video/computer games. I think it's also the convenience food factor that's really doing the most damage. Convenience foods - prepackaged, loaded with corn syrup, enriched white flour, partially hydrogenated oils and other additives - are cheap, fast and the first thing busy moms and dads will grab. You add that to lack of activity, and there you have it. I think low income families can afford healthy alternatives (we did), but need sound nutritional advice. Doctors do not give a lot of nutritional guidance to their patients. Community efforts to educate people are on the rise, and maybe that's what will make the difference. I wish all pediatricians would counsel new parents on lifetime nutritional and exercise habits more thoroughly. Maybe that's where it needs to begin. Great topic!  
Date: 12/30/2003 5:59:00 PM  From Authorid: 54968    Interesting post.  
Date: 12/30/2003 6:09:00 PM  From Authorid: 62503    wow... quite interesting  
Date: 12/30/2003 8:02:00 PM  From Authorid: 34476    I think that only in America do the "poor" have a weight problem .....  
Date: 12/30/2003 8:05:00 PM  From Authorid: 24732    I think it probably has more to do with their location. If your family has more money you usually live in a nicer area with more places to excercise and move around. Some poor people live in neighborhoods with crime in them, so they are discouraged from going outside. Who wants to jog
around in a neighborhood with drive by shootings going on around you? Sure they could excercise inside, but that would be unlikely.
  
Date: 12/30/2003 10:22:00 PM  From Authorid: 3321    Having been there, still kind of there, and in college at that, the cheapest foods are those highest in carbs, fats, and trans-fatty acids. Just look at your grocery store shelves. Pasta, bread, macaroni and cheese, snack cakes, etc. It is all food that is not healthy when the diet is entirely centered around it. On the other hand, I'm lucky if I can afford to buy lettuce and salad dressing once every few weeks. I enjoy eating healthy, but the college budget doesn't allow it, and nor does the budget of someone at poverty level allow it. Its common sense.  
Date: 12/30/2003 10:26:00 PM  From Authorid: 3321    Yes, but Base, a can of vegetables doesn't make a meal like a box of spaghetti does. Its pretty clear those of you who disagree have never been worried about whether you'll be able to even eat more than once in a day-just go look at your grocery store-what person with 4 or more mouths to feed and $5 to spend on dinner is going to get a few cans of vegetables when 2 boxes of pasta and a couple of jars of sauce will feed the family for 2-3 days. Use your head.  
Date: 12/31/2003 1:19:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 62410    Lady Luck: Your scenario is only meant for people who own a piece of land... most poor people I know don't make enough money to have a piece of dirt to grow their own veggies or raise a cow -- not to mention, it totally leaves out urban dwellers. Not all poor people live in the sticks.
Date: 12/31/2003 1:21:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 62410    Good point CASSEOPEIA - I agree, lack of activity is a major factor.
Date: 12/31/2003 1:24:00 PM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 62410    Nice arguement PERSEPHONE.
Date: 1/1/2004 10:48:00 AM  From Authorid: 36704    "84% of the poor say their families have more than enough to eat, 13% say sometimes they do not, and 3% say they often do not have enough to eat" Having to eat spaghetti three days in a row isn't going to make someone overweight. The ones that have more than enough to eat can buy better foods. Sometimes people run short of money, it happens. If it happens all the time for years, the person's an idiot.  

Find great Easter stories on Angels Feather
Information Privacy policy and Copyrights

Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization

Pages:525 741 1046 1174 360 792 1026 1229 607 811 687 297 48 155 452 12 1077 143 1267 431 1227 674 333 55 1094 457 25 1054 1467 832 1223 494 845 397 229 1164 1367 1235 501 395 738 1134 770 89 550 616 1171 1144 609 761 165 1479 63 1432 1462 856 519 1498 554 1309 1578 1064 428 1568 1552 890 504 1481 194 620 348 444 219 606 607 1021 1233 932 1126 172 455 841 1078 78 243 157 1089 165 19 1114