Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index Go to Free account page
Go to frequently asked mystery questions Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index
Welcome: to Unsolved Mysteries 1 2 3
 
 New Mystery StoryNew Unsolved Mystery UserLogon to Unsolved MysteriesRead Random Mystery StoryChat on Unsolved MysteriesMystery Coffee houseGeneral Mysterious AdviceSerious Mysterious AdviceReplies Wanted on these mystery stories
 




Show Stories by
Newest
Recently Updated
Wanting Replies
Recently Replied to
Discussions&Questions
Site Suggestions
Highest Rated
Most Rated
General Advice

Ancient Beliefs
Angels, God, Spiritual
Animals&Pets
Comedy
Conspiracy Theories
Debates
Dreams
Dream Interpretation
Embarrassing Moments
Entertainment
ESP
General Interest
Ghosts/Apparitions
Hauntings
History
Horror
Household tips
Human Interest
Humor / Jokes
In Recognition of
Lost Friends/Family
Missing Persons
Music
Mysterious Happenings
Mysterious Sounds
Near Death Experience
Ouija Mysteries
Out of Body Experience
Party Line
Philosophy
Poetry
Prayers
Predictions
Psychic Advice
Quotes
Religious / Religions
Reviews
Riddles
Science
Sci-fi
Serious Advice
Strictly Fiction
Unsolved Crimes
UFOs
Urban Legends
USM Events and People
USM Games
In Memory of
Self Help
Search Stories:


Stories By AuthorId:


Google
Web Site   

Bookmark and Share



Bush: Halliburton Must Pay for Overcharge

  Author:  47218  Category:(News) Created:(12/13/2003 8:03:00 AM)
This post has been Viewed (1037 times)

Bush: Halliburton Must Pay for Overcharge

By MATT KELLEY, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - As Democrats demand further investigations of Vice President Dick Cheney's former company, President Bush says Halliburton Co. should repay the government if it overcharged for fuel in Iraq.

"If there's an overcharge, like we think there is, we expect that money to be repaid," the president told reporters Friday when asked about the contract controversy.

Pentagon auditors say Houston-based Halliburton charged up to $61 million too much for delivering gasoline to Iraqi citizens under a no-bid contract to rebuild Iraq's dilapidated oil industry. The company denies overcharging.

Meanwhile, an Army spokesman disclosed that companies from France, Germany, Russia and Canada won't be eligible to replace Halliburton as the recipient of the oil reconstruction contract.

The Army Corps of Engineers is reviewing bids and hopes to decide this month who will get the oil reconstruction deals worth up to $800 million in northern Iraq and $1.2 billion in the south.

The decision means that an additional $2 billion in contracts in Iraq, not disclosed before, would be forbidden to countries that opposed the war, along with the $18.6 billion in Iraq work the administration declared off-limits earlier this week.

The countries that have been left out see the rules as payback, but Bush says limiting contracts to countries that sent troops and money to Iraq makes sense and will encourage more nations to join the U.S.-led coalition.

Democrats have joined the fray, saying the president is needlessly alienating allies and rewarding political supporters. Cheney headed Halliburton from 1995 until he became Bush's running mate in 2000, and other executives from the company gave generously to the Bush campaign.

"George W. Bush is preventing entire nations from bidding on contracts in Iraq so his campaign contributors can continue to overcharge the American taxpayers," Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean said Friday while campaigning in Iowa.

The political impact is unclear. As long ago as last May, in a CBS-New York Times poll, about half the respondents said they thought the administration gave contracts to companies because they had close Republican ties.

Pentagon officials say they gave Halliburton the prewar oil reconstruction contract because it was essential to start rebuilding quickly after the U.S.-led invasion. Halliburton already had a competitively bid contract to provide short-notice logistical help for the Army.

Separately under that contract, Halliburton has been paid about $3 billion for supporting the military with cafeterias, mail delivery and other services.

The oil contract started as a relatively small order for fighting oil well fires and has grown into the largest reconstruction contract in Iraq. Halliburton has received more than $2.2 billion so far on that contract.

Together, the 11 other Iraq reconstruction projects awarded to other companies have paid out $1.7 billion. The largest, to construction conglomerate Bechtel Corp. for rebuilding infrastructure such as highways and bridges, has delivered more than $1 billion so far.

The largest part of Halliburton's oil reconstruction contract is providing gasoline and other fuel to Iraqis while the country's oil industry is being rebuilt.

A Pentagon audit found Halliburton was charging $1.09 more per gallon for gasoline it trucked into Iraq from Kuwait than for the same fuel imported from Turkey.

Pentagon officials said Thursday that Halliburton's Kuwaiti subcontractor apparently charged too much for the gasoline. Halliburton's president, Dave Lesar, said the Kuwaiti firm was the only one that met the contract's requirements. Lesar said Halliburton earned "a few cents on the dollar" for delivering the fuel.

Under the contract, Halliburton gets a guaranteed profit calculated as part of the company's costs. In other words, the higher the costs, the more money for Halliburton.

Halliburton is guaranteed a profit equal to at least 2 percent of its costs. Depending on performance, Halliburton can earn a profit of up to 7 percent of costs.

If the subcontractor were to overcharge by $61 million, Halliburton would be guaranteed $1.2 million in profit from that amount. If Halliburton earned the entire 7 percent, its profit on the overcharge would be about $4.3 million.

The Army Corps of Engineers is reviewing bids for the $2 billion in contracts that will replace Halliburton's no-bid award. At least 69 companies — including Halliburton — were sent solicitations, according to a Corps Web site.

You can join Unsolved Mysteries and post your own mysteries or
interesting stories for the world to read and respond to Click here

Scroll all the way down to read replies.

Show all stories by   Author:  47218 ( Click here )

Halloween is Right around the corner.. .







 
Replies:      
Date: 12/13/2003 8:17:00 AM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 47218    wow. I'm reluctant to believe that our government was motivated in any by profit to attack Iraq, so I'll lay judgment on that aside. But I will say that blithely handing a large contract to a major campaign contributor who then proceeds to deliver cruddy service is pretty shameless. I'm actually totally disgusted.  
Date: 12/13/2003 10:28:00 AM  From Authorid: 15228    In a deal cut in June 2000 under President Clinton, the New York Post reports that Halliburton won 11 Navy contracts worth $110 million to build jails at Guantanamo Bay, a base in Kuwait, a ferry terminal on Vieques, an air station in Spain, a breakwater in the Azores and facilities slammed by a typhoon in Guam....Why would we go to war just so a large corporation could make money? Bush/Cheney have no connections with the company any longer. Cheney was forced to sell all his stock when he ran for vice-president. I believe it is more likely Haliburton has the most experience in reconstuction and that is why they get awarded the big contracts. They were also involved in construction projects in the Balkins.

Though the company is known for its strong backing of Republican candidates, Halliburton contributed over $140,000 to Democrats from 1992-2000, according to the Center for Responsive Politics
  
Date: 12/13/2003 11:34:00 AM  ( From Author ) From Authorid: 47218    June 2000...that's long before the 2002 SEC probe of this company for, of all things, overstating their costs and seriously over running their budget on various government projects (including the project in the Balkins, by the way). hm. So I guess its just coincidence that the company, which our vice president headed just before he took office and, which made a huge contribution to his campaign is handed a fat contract sans any need to compete for it? But obviously it was their meritous record which recommended them. You know, the administration spent millions of dollars on competetive outsourcing studies so that they can pay the Whitehouse gardeners a couple dollars less an hour, while they just hand out multimillion dollar defense contracts. I fail to see the sense in it.  
Date: 12/13/2003 3:59:00 PM  From Authorid: 62410    If we have to COERCE support from other nations for the wars we start then maybe we should re-examine our reasons for going to war. The "coalition of the willing" was severely over-inflated. I can't believe our government gets away with things mafiosos go down for. Scall

Find great Easter stories on Angels Feather
Information Privacy policy and Copyrights

Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization

Pages:496 179 1480 422 967 721 791 85 1589 416 620 1049 941 826 1190 748 1219 666 48 1438 1356 437 594 620 148 1047 205 1065 1382 1237 1158 440 159 205 1157 531 18 632 259 870 63 909 197 760 87 555 903 99 1296 1253 639 604 1035 263 1318 1040 716 257 1427 840 1337 338 557 932 1010 266 1125 166 889 286 900 138 288 1350 327 810 214 940 651 1345 885 501 847 1323 1259 457 1338 768 560 441