Date: 11/24/2002 5:58:00 PM
From Authorid: 17516
Ummm, where does he mention Jesus? I can't seem to find it. Oh and where does he refer to God (a generic term) as Jehovah, which would tell us he meant the bible god?? Help me out here cause I'm just not getting it. |
Date: 11/24/2002 6:19:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 10146
KK, did you not read the First post? Part ONE, at the ending? and you don't get it? You did "READ" the first posting of this numbered part One didn't you? |
Date: 11/24/2002 6:52:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 10146
Oh..., and KARMAKILLER, if you want to see where they are refering to the bible God. Please go to this continuing post "PART THREE" and Please read and be watching for the words "biblical precedents". OKIE DOKIE! I mean bible.... biblical they "ARE" one in the same arn't they? |
Date: 11/24/2002 7:04:00 PM
From Authorid: 59214
Oh I agree, you are a pure genius.
...Find the sarcasm... |
Date: 11/24/2002 11:16:00 PM
From Authorid: 46266
MaiLani, I have just seen you in post after post either spending your precious time saying "This post isn't worth my time." (more than once) or some other unintelligible blurt of sarcasm. Post only where it interests you, and show some sign of pondering the post - especially if you're trying to say something in the Debates section. Thank you. |
Date: 11/24/2002 11:24:00 PM
From Authorid: 34814
Sarcasim is very good thing to have LMAO This post is a waste of my time for sure. |
Date: 11/26/2002 11:28:00 PM
From Authorid: 24924
THERE IS NO MENTION OF ANY "JESUS CHRIST" in the proclamation. WHEN "GOD" is mentioned, it is NOT the Jesus Christ of the bible. WHERE is your "proof", Haadam? Come on, hit me with it. |
Date: 11/27/2002 4:56:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 10146
Thinker, You want to read the Words Jesus Christ in one of these post, on the Thankgiving Proclamation? Well I noticed you left me a comment on Part Two, as well as part Three, of this Proclamation debate.Why did you skip "PART ONE"? If you want to read the words of George Washington saying the words that Mention Jesus Christ, Read the Post in Part One of this debate. Not all the replies, but the Storie POST itself, Pay attention to George's words at the Bottom. You too, can read all the Replies to part one as well, if you wish to do so. But the Words "JESUS CHRIST" is in the Part One post itself! Why did you not leave your comment about Jesus on that Part of the posting? |
Date: 11/27/2002 7:01:00 AM
From Authorid: 24924
Haadam, 'tis a clever little trick you did there in your first post. You see, YOU ADDED on to Washington's proclamation (WHICH DOES NOT MENTION ANY JESUS CHRIST) of OCT 1789........you ADDED words onto it from the FIRST thanksgiving proclamation of JUNE 20, 1676. On June, 20, 1676, the governing council of Charlestown, Mass., held a meeting to determine how best to express thanks for the good fortune that had seen their community securely established, and by unaminous vote, they INSTRUCTED Edward Rawson, the CLERK, to PROCLAIM JUNE 29TH as a day of thanksgiving, OUR FIRST. Haadam, it is from THAT proclamation (the part mentioning Jesus Christ)by the CLERK, that YOU, and the christian nation revisionists, STEAL from and USE, twist and ADD TO Washington's proclamation! Got it? Now.....if you wish me to post the ENTIRE 1st proclamation by the clerk, Edward Rawson, of 1676.....as well as Washington's proclamation of Oct 1789, I will do so, but it is sooooooooooo available in the record for ANYONE who wishes to know and accept the truth. |
Date: 11/27/2002 4:50:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 10146
Thinker, would the governing council of Charlestown, Mass. (which must have been before we became a full fledged nation) be considered part of the founding men who had a goal to make the New land a nation? They by unaminous vote Reverenced JESUS CHRIST! The last paragraph above mentions that, Shortly after (some) Thanksgiving Proclamation was written, it was lost for over a hundred years. Very Convenient huh! Which Proclamation was lost I wonder? The June 20,1676, or the Oct. 1789? You probably would say it is the Oct.1789 correct? Well.., which ever it was, it is noted above that it did not appear in the official archives until 1921. As I will now post for your reminder, "However, it happened the original manuscript was not in the official archives until 1921 when Dr. J. C. Fitzpatrick, then assistant chief of the manuscripts division of the Library of Congress "found" the proclamation. It was at an auction sale being held at an art gallery in New York. It was written in long hand by Wm. Jackson, secretary to President Washington and was signed by George Washington. Dr Fitzpatrick purchased the document for $300.00 for the Library of Congress, where it now resides. WE both know that good old George Washington could not have signed both documents! " Now..,June 20,1676, to Oct. 1789, is over a 100 years Correct. One of the documents was lost for that long. As is Stated above. Which one was it? I think it was the First one, of June 20, 1676. However you will note in the Above Proclamation, (the one that you are defending)the one of Oct. 1789, in the second paragragh a beneficent author is Mentioned! And Author is identified as someone, (generaly) who has written a book. What commonly used holy book, did people of that day use as a majority? The Bible perhaps? Then in the same Paragraph it is said that this Author is being Thanked for his kind care and Protection of the people of this country. Does this sound like a DEIST, who's beleif is concidered as those who believe that the, One Creator God ABANDONED his Creation after it was created, to fend for themselves, as the DEIST proclaim? WEll Does it? Now I would have you to focus on the third paragraph, before George Washingtons Signature is placed. Note in that paragraph the words, "great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions;". Again, does this sound like a statement a DEIST would make? And who is Recognized, and refered to, as "LORD" in religions? Only in the Christian Religious practises, is the word "LORD" used in reverence to one man, who is called Jesus Christ! I personaly know of no other religion that proudly uses the word "LORD" so common in reverence to LORD GOD! It appears to me, that WE, the CHRISTIAN people, of this nation as it was being formed was lied to, by certain Anti-Christ Influence, in its beginning, and has presently become a full complete Anti-Christ Governing Power, that may very well become the RULER of this Present intire World. With one man as a leader of its head, the President! But, Which president? Perhaps he will be the mimicking one, in the opposite beleif, of the First Good old "George". |
Date: 11/27/2002 8:14:00 PM
From Authorid: 16671
STANDS UP claps HANDS, BRAVO Haadam!! WEll said!! |
Date: 12/22/2002 11:38:00 PM
From Authorid: 53836
I feel the internet's action of publishing all info, no matter how farse it may be, has really manipulated the truth of this country's founding beliefs. I am really glad you took the time to post this excellent reference! |
Date: 12/28/2002 12:18:00 PM
From Authorid: 50249
YESSSSSSSSSSS!!!! GO Haadam!!!! Well said to THinker. Thinker thinks she knows all!!! Oh yes, she studied from lots of sources!!!! But, are those sources true? The Bible says that some people who claim to be so "wise" and with lots of "knowledge" turn out to be the contrary, for they lack the source of all knowledge and wisdom which is in God. So, I see that Karma Killer and Thinker left the post, huh? Maybe they don't have anything more to say with that long and excellent explanation you gave to them. Great post!!! |