Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index Go to Free account page
Go to frequently asked mystery questions Go to Unsolved Mystery Publications Main Index
Welcome: to Unsolved Mysteries 1 2 3
 
 New Mystery StoryNew Unsolved Mystery UserLogon to Unsolved MysteriesRead Random Mystery StoryChat on Unsolved MysteriesMystery Coffee housePsychic Advice on Unsolved MysteriesGeneral Mysterious AdviceSerious Mysterious AdviceReplies Wanted on these mystery stories
 




Show Stories by
Newest
Recently Updated
Wanting Replies
Recently Replied to
Discussions&Questions
Site Suggestions
Highest Rated
Most Rated
General Advice

Ancient Beliefs
Angels, God, Spiritual
Animals&Pets
Comedy
Conspiracy Theories
Debates
Dreams
Dream Interpretation
Embarrassing Moments
Entertainment
ESP
General Interest
Ghosts/Apparitions
Hauntings
History
Horror
Household tips
Human Interest
Humor / Jokes
In Recognition of
Lost Friends/Family
Missing Persons
Music
Mysterious Happenings
Mysterious Sounds
Near Death Experience
Ouija Mysteries
Out of Body Experience
Party Line
Philosophy
Poetry
Prayers
Predictions
Psychic Advice
Quotes
Religious / Religions
Reviews
Riddles
Science
Sci-fi
Serious Advice
Strictly Fiction
Unsolved Crimes
UFOs
Urban Legends
USM Events and People
USM Games
In Memory of
Self Help
Search Stories:


Stories By AuthorId:


Google
Web Site   

Bookmark and Share



FBI probes possible Saudi, 9/11 money ties

  Author:  55021  Category:(News) Created:(11/23/2002 8:50:00 PM)
This post has been Viewed (1026 times)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The FBI is investigating whether the Saudi Arabian government funneled money to associates of two of the September 11 hijackers, a senior White House official told CNN Saturday.

Findings from an inquiry by the House-Senate Joint Intelligence Committee suggest evidence indicates money from the Saudi Arabian government could have made its way to the two hijackers through two Saudi students when they were in California.

There is some evidence that the students received a payment through the wife of the Saudi ambassador to the United States, according to the inquiry.

But sources said there is no conclusive evidence the Saudi government intentionally funded terror activities against the United States. Fifteen of the 19 September 11 hijackers were Saudis. The Saudi government has condemned their actions.

A U.S. government official said it is not unusual for wealthy Saudi families to send money to less affluent Saudi students. In addition, the official said, that money often is sent through the Saudi Embassy.

Adel Al-Jubeir, a foreign policy adviser to Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah, told CNN that Princess Haifa Al-Faisal, wife of Saudi Ambassador, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, is "a very generous woman" who supports many charitable causes.

The princess, however, never sent any money directly to the two hijackers, Al-Jubeir said. An investigation by her office has found the princess sent money to a woman on her charity recipient list and that woman then sent the money to the students.

Al-Faisal does not know who the woman is or why she was on her list, Al-Jubeir said.

"The FBI investigated this matter six months ago [and] the embassy cooperated with them fully," Al-Jubeir said.

He compared the embassy's situation to that of any U.S. bank in which the hijackers might have had an account. The bank, he said, would be no more guilty of aiding the hijackers than is the Saudi embassy.

Congress is preparing a report that suggests the FBI did not aggressively pursue leads concerning the Saudi government and terrorism.

Officials have denied the charge but said they will not comment on details of any ongoing investigation. The FBI issued a statement saying the two Saudi students who, according to sources, received money from the princess were charged with visa fraud. Sources said they are both currently in Saudi Arabia.

"Six months later, what we find surprising is that in Congress, these charges come out," said Al-Jubeir. "We read about it in the media, which leads me to believe that there's a lot of political play here that may not be in line with the facts as we know them, as the FBI knows them, or the facts as Princess Haifa's office has determined."

White House officials traveling with President Bush in Europe acknowledged the FBI and CIA were opposed to making public what they consider highly sensitive information in the case. The officials also said that it would be improper to release information now because of the ongoing FBI investigation.

Al-Jubeir stressed that Saudi Arabia continues to "mercilessly" pursue al Qaeda members and other terrorists.

"It shouldn't be surprising that the president and the secretary of state and all of your senior officials consistently, and on the record, have stated that Saudi Arabia has been most cooperative in this effort," he said.

"The last thing we would do is fund people who would murder us."

You can join Unsolved Mysteries and post your own mysteries or
interesting stories for the world to read and respond to Click here

Scroll all the way down to read replies.

Show all stories by   Author:  55021 ( Click here )

Halloween is Right around the corner.. .







 
Replies:      
Date: 11/23/2002 11:52:00 PM  From Authorid: 23610    I wonder what the Bush Administration will do if they do find ties. I mean didn't Bush say that anybody found collaborating with the terrorists would be punished? I'd be curious to see if he would risk the U.S. ties with Saudi Arabia based on his own words.  
Date: 11/24/2002 6:25:00 AM  From Authorid: 58308    Son!! Hugs! Zeeboette  
Date: 11/24/2002 6:25:00 PM  From Authorid: 55967    Lady Nyx, I don't think he said that. What I heard was him saying "If you are not for us, you are against us" and "Any country harbouring these terrorists are our enemy also." (Possibly not direct quotes, but to that effect). So he wouldn't attack to punish Saudi Arabia, but yea, I wonder how our ties with them will be now, too. Peace. ~GypsyHawk~  
Date: 11/25/2002 12:42:00 AM  From Authorid: 23610    Here are a couple of Bush's quotes ... “All nations that have aided or are suspected of aiding terrorists or developing weapons of mass destruction must now open their countries to inspection teams from the United Nations and the United States.....The United States will attack in order to defend against all terrorist attacks before they occur on our soil. All nations, including the Arab nations, must realize and accept the fact that the United States is going on the attack as a defensive measure to protect its very survival as a first-rate nation.” ..... and ..... "For every regime that sponsors terror, there is a price to be paid, and it will be paid. The allies of terror are equally guilty of murder and equally accountable to justice.”  
Date: 11/25/2002 1:01:00 AM  From Authorid: 55967    Yea, good point. He pretty much said he's ready to attack any nation that sponsors terror. But I doubt he'll use military force against SA. He'll make them "pay the price" in other ways, I think. Either way, our relationship with them will definitely not be the same. I remember hearing his speeches, but didn't recall those exact words. Thanks. ~GypsyHawk~  
Date: 11/25/2002 1:05:00 AM  From Authorid: 55967    ^^^Reasons I don't think he'll use military force: one, his plate is full with Iraq. Two, when he said this, I believe he was looking at countries who may have been currently harboring terrorists, thus being an immediate threat, and the investigations into that area do not include SA right now, and three, he can still get around those words he said and not attack SA. Peace. ~GypsyHawk~  
Date: 11/25/2002 1:34:00 AM  From Authorid: 23610    I agree, GypsyHawk. I don't think he would attack them either. I mean how could we, when we need them as allies. But it does make him have to kind of eat his words and it is a bit hypocritical...kind of like "Well, we'll attack you...but only if you can't do anything for us." I quess with my warped sense of humor I just find it kind of ironic and funny.  
Date: 11/25/2002 10:58:00 AM  From Authorid: 11723    Okay...here is what I believe. Saudi Arabia = Oil. Therefore George "Dubblya" will do everything in his power to keep good ties with them. There has been more than one time when Saudi Arabia has been implicated in helping out/harboring terrorists. Many months back, when the Israeli government raided Arafat's Ramahallah compound, they found documents that found the Saudi government has been funneling money to the PLO and other Terrorist factions. And the US government did exactly what I thought they were going to do with the information...they swept it under the rug. Now as to why Bush is trying to remain in the good graces of the Saudi's is beyond me...the only reason I can come up with is Oil. Bush comes from an Oil family. His family made its money on oil. He made money off of oil. Cheney made money from corporations and oil. Saudi's are one of the largest oil exporters in the world...why else would they be kissing their butts? I mean, I've seen ads saying that "Drugs fund terrorists." That's bull. Oil funds terrorists! These oil producing countries support terrorists. I mean, when we went to war in 1941, there was a popular ad campaign for Oil Conservation, "If your riding alone, your riding with Hitler." Its funny, we are supposedly at war...yet I don't see anyone saying to conserve oil. I think Bush is going against his own doctrine for the sake of "good business". Basically at the end of all those statements, he should throw in "Except Saudi Arabia". My theory is, that Bin Laden is hiding out in Saudi Arabia. Its the perfect place for him. That's where he is originally from, he has ties there...and the US refuses to doggedly pursue him in that country.  
Date: 11/26/2002 12:05:00 AM  From Authorid: 55967    lol. True, Lady Nyx. Mydnite Son, okay, a part of the reason we are allies with Saudi is because of oil. But not at all for the reasons you gave. The US has had a long history of doing business with Saudi, and our economy is tied up with inport/exporting with many countries, Saudi included, for oil. They are just a long-standing supplier for our country; it is not because Bush has a personal agenda to snag more crude for his own family business. It can be argued that the US has enough oil for itself for many, many years, and yes, it does. The govn't. has decided, though, that we keep our economic ties for the present, and let the status quo alone; our own oil is sold elsewhere and earmarked for emergencies. About the slogans of war, we are not even close to the kind of war we were in during WWII, and we are much, much richer than we were then. We don't need to ration (that's what that was for). As for Bin Laden, he was kicked out of Saudi long before he attacked us, and I think a much more safer place for him to hide would be Irag, reputed enemy of the US and other Western countries, or Iran. Peace. ~GypsyHawk~  
Date: 11/27/2002 6:48:00 AM  From Authorid: 11723    You brought up some good points...however, I still think Saudi Arabia is two-faced. I DO NOT think they are our friends/allies.  

Find great Easter stories on Angels Feather
Information Privacy policy and Copyrights

Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization

Pages:266 942 567 636 1500 397 1137 922 1452 100 544 1153 1005 1110 510 663 1451 46 83 407 824 105 963 1387 222 98 427 274 931 1464 651 1434 352 1302 841 554 1123 193 952 666 1449 827 1017 1373 222 625 870 1273 949 767 272 783 76 1216 1034 566 1313 943 1546 358 1558 149 1298 1385 1225 1298 1006 1199 565 931 1540 93 1196 1102 44 1533 21 394 865 178 1160 1350 1276 710 1072 695 2 254 1278 761