|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| |||||||||||||||
Date: 8/28/2002 8:41:00 PM
From Authorid: 52866
See one of Enki's posts...they do NOT have nukes  |
|
Date: 8/28/2002 8:43:00 PM
From Authorid: 52866
http://unsolvedmysteries.com/usm292249.html |
Date: 8/28/2002 8:43:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 59214
Love bug, you have possibly made my day the brightest!  |
|
Date: 8/28/2002 8:43:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 59214
What about chemicals that cause mass illness? |
|
Date: 8/28/2002 8:44:00 PM
From Authorid: 52866
THey do not have weapons of mass destruction or nuclear bombs |
|
Date: 8/28/2002 8:45:00 PM
From Authorid: 52866
I don't believe they possess the technology to generate those kinds of chemicals... |
Date: 8/28/2002 8:45:00 PM
From Authorid: 25828
i grew up in the 80's when we were always worried russia might drop a bomb at anytime......'the day after'..what a movie..i had nightmares for a week...yeah it could happen...but i would hope they aren't 'that' stupid...  |
Date: 8/28/2002 8:49:00 PM
From Authorid: 40543
Nukes no, Scientists probably, Matierials easily. Doesnt take a whole lot when you have to materials and the know how.  |
Date: 8/28/2002 8:50:00 PM
From Authorid: 20750
There has been no confirmed proof they have nukes!  |
|
Date: 8/28/2002 8:54:00 PM
From Authorid: 20750
psst! that 's why alot of other countries oppose the usa starting a war in Iraq!! |
Date: 8/28/2002 8:55:00 PM
From Authorid: 15070
thank you, Luv Bug. I was ready to get upset.  |
Date: 8/28/2002 9:01:00 PM
From Authorid: 51871
We have nothing to fear. What we see on CNN and all the other networks are simply "sanitized" reports, and they don't tell you everything. Right now I'd bet my bottom dollar that Delta Force, Seal Team Six, the Rangers, and all the other special operations teams are already over there "relieving" them of their nuclear weapons.  |
Date: 8/28/2002 9:02:00 PM
From Authorid: 51871
If they even have them.. |
Date: 8/28/2002 9:07:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
I've thought that Sadam was nothing but trouble ever since the Gulf War. I always felt that he would continue to be up to no good, hiding weapons and plotting against the U.S. I still feel this way today. Good post  |
|
Date: 8/28/2002 9:08:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
If they don't have anything to hide, then why don't they let the U.N. do their inspections? |
Date: 8/28/2002 9:10:00 PM
From Authorid: 54429
They do have chemical weopons, dont kid yourself we have video of them testing it on dogs. ~SlightOfHand  |
Date: 8/28/2002 9:11:00 PM
From Authorid: 3395
Well, if we the U.S. would leave them alone they wouldn't try to drop anything on us. I think it's all just a plot our government has wrongly made and they have used September 11th as the perfect excuse to go over there and mess with them. I don't agree with taking advantage of a national tragedy when one has a completely different motive (not to stop terrorism but to cause trouble in the arab world). Oh well. Peace,   |
|
Date: 8/28/2002 9:14:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
One more thing...they do have more oil then anyone and oil=money. Money means you can get what ever you want when it comes to weapons. I just refuse to trust that they don't have nukes. Never underestimate an enemy, at least in war. |
| Date: 8/28/2002 9:22:00 PM From Authorid: 55376 They will have nukes.Something must be done before they get them, not afterwards. Og |
Date: 8/28/2002 9:23:00 PM
From Authorid: 16114
I LIVE ON LONG ISLAND NY!!!! Oh No!!! Nuclear bombs!  What a shame how stupid nuclear bombs were made.  |
|
Date: 8/28/2002 9:32:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
They shouldn't be left alone until they follow the U.N. regulations like everyone else. |
Date: 8/28/2002 10:11:00 PM
From Authorid: 56780
Well i agree with HollyLoveBug , but "You Choose" : oil= money !!!! ok but i don't think you know that Iraq is one of the poorest countries ! the people don't have anything to eat it costs 1/4 of a regular employee's salary to buy a can of powder milk (Nido) "if you know it, Europeans know it" !!!! think about how those people are living ... take care everyone , Bahraini Prince  |
|
Date: 8/28/2002 10:35:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
With all due respect Prince... just because the people are starving doesn't mean Sadam is. Do you honestly think he has his people's best interest at heart? Obviously not, if they're are starving. I wouldn't put his buying nukes before food any day. OIL does =money and they have a lot more of it then we will truly know. ~peace |
Date: 8/29/2002 12:44:00 AM
From Authorid: 49639
Dont fret Ralph wiggins, the USA has a lot more security then you might think. Youll be okay. k9mom  |
Date: 8/29/2002 3:16:00 AM
From Authorid: 1799
very interesting thought..i guess ppl will always worry about that..and i for one hope it never happens...but i doubt they have the money for nuclear weapons or anything....i mean, Iraq is a pretty poor place and if they did, it wouldn't be very many.  |
Date: 8/29/2002 5:09:00 AM
From Authorid: 35720
They don't have nukes but they CAN get them.. we have to PREVENT them from doing so! Why just sit around and let them make nukes when we could be stopping them?  |
Date: 8/29/2002 5:19:00 AM
From Authorid: 11528
Good Morning You Choose, You asked" Why dont they let the UN Inspectors do thier job"? Well they did. They allowed UN Inspectors to go anywhere in the country at any time, unnanounced and conduct thier inspections for 7 1/2 years. These inspections were conducted at any location at any time of the day or night. They even allowed the inspectors to inspect the Royal palace. Yet the sanctions were never lifted. There was also friction amongst the inspection teams because some of the American teams were CIA and were installing cameras and listening devices to spy. A team from Australia got very upset because the US was demanding they participate in activities that were not part of thier UN mandate. The Australian team leader even pulled out and left due to interferance by the US team of inspectors. After 7 1/2 years Iraq kicked them out. I mean how long do You submit to being searched over and over again and yet the embargo was never lifted. Bye for now. Enki  |
Date: 8/29/2002 5:27:00 AM
From Authorid: 51876
What Enki said is correct as usual.The spin has never stopped,the military and energy companies have to find a antagonist to scapegoat every hour of every day of every year........BruiextheGreenman  |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 5:32:00 AM
From Authorid: 11528
Hi Bahraini Prince. You stated that Iraq is one of the poorest nations. At the time that hostilities first began they were quite well off. They were also on the verge of being elevated to First World status. Now America and Britian have bombed them back to third world status. There is a lot of disinformation in Western Media about Iraq and Saddam. For one thing people are under the impression that he is some Religious fanatic. This is not true at all. He is very moderate in his beliefs and he strongly believes in seperation of Religion and state. This is why Iran waged war on him at the urging of Israel who was supplying Iran with weapons. Saddams popularity amongs all Arab nations was seen as a threat to Israel so they started pumping money and arms to Iran and used Irans Islamic fundamentalism opposed to Saddams moderation to stoke the fires of war. The only reason Iraq has nothing now and little food and medicine is that the UN sanctions have made obtaining goods next to impossible. They cant even import pencils because there is an ingredient in the lead of the pencils that is also found in weapons. How ridiculous. Bye for now. Enki |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 5:35:00 AM
From Authorid: 11528
Hi Ghost teller, Iraq does not have nuclear weapons, that has been confirmed after 7 1/2 years of inspections. Do not be afraid. Even if they did have nukes they still do not have the technology to launch them all the way over to the US. Dont buy into the fear mongering of the major media. Bye for now. Enki |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 5:43:00 AM
From Authorid: 11528
Hi You choose, they did follow UN regulations just like everyone else. They followed those regulations for 7 1/2 years and still the US would not allow the lifting of sanctions contrary to the agreement made by the UN. Even as recently as a few weeks ago they invited the UN teams to come back again for another look around and all they asked was that the inspections be done, then the teams leave and not stick around for another 7 1/2 years. The UN declined.Iraq also invited the US Congress to come over and have a look themselves but the congress said NO. What else can Saddam do to lift the sanctions. Its obvious to the world now what is going on and that is why the world is now saying enough, leave Iraq alone. He has no WMD, he permitted the inspections for 7 1/2 years. Its time to lift those sanctions. Send medicine first, there are a lot of sick children. 700,000 are already dead and 5,000 die every month on average from the Depleted Uranium dust from the US and British bombs that have covered Iraq with radioactive dust. These are kids who were not even born at the start of Desert Storm back in 1991. Bye for now. Enki |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 5:51:00 AM
From Authorid: 11528
Hi Emi, Iraq is not a poor country. They were in excellent shape until the war started in 1991. They were selling lots of oil and thier standard of living was very high. They had excellent mediacal care. LOts of schools because Saddam believes in education. He was funding the arts a lot and even restoring ancient Archaelogical sites. His government was democratically elected and he was immensely popular among the Arab countries. Israel was concerned because he was promoting unity amongst the Arab nations and Israel doesnt want that. They began supplying Iran with weapons and encouraged Iran to oust Saddam. They also supplied the Kurds with weapons in the North of Iraq and the south to create internal dissent. Dont be fooled, Iraq has oil and is not poor. Its just that with the sanctions in place they cant import anything. They will survive though and once Britain and the US stop bombing them and sanctions are lifted they will thrive again. Bye for now. Enki |
Date: 8/29/2002 8:14:00 AM
From Authorid: 57676
People need to understand that if Iraq has nukes, they don't have long range capacity like cruise missiles. They won't be able to anywhere near us. Their main targets would probably be Israel, US Camps, etc., but defenitely not north america. All we need to do is to figure out something with Russia so we both can just take that chunk off of the planet. - Ace Archer  |
| Date: 8/29/2002 8:30:00 AM From Authorid: 53828 As far as I know, Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction. If they did somehow aquire some, they wouldn't use them against the United States because we are the most powerful country in the world. They would have a limited supply as well, and would therefore dig their own graves. *CARNAGE* |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 9:02:00 AM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 59214
I've, for the most part, been put to ease by your replies, but no matter what there's always a shadowing doutb in my mind.But What Ifs are human kind's worst enemy. Thanks all you! *hug* |
Date: 8/29/2002 10:20:00 AM
From Authorid: 28363
There is always at least a half truth when Enki tells his stories about Iraq-- For one there are several presidential palaces that have been built since Iraq invaded Kuwait and raped/stole/tortured/and murdered, men women and children, before they set the entire Kuwaiti oil field on fire and they also left time released chemicals to be mixed with the burning oil which is causing the gulf war syndrome problems. Also, the top Nuclear scientist for Iraq has defected to the US. I dont see Enki mentioning this. The reports from this Iraqi Nuclear scientist contains the information about how far advanced they are with Nuclear weapons and chemicals for mass destruction. They have already used chemicals on Kurds in the north (remember). I hope we don't bomb them back to the stone age, but for them to pretend they are this peaceful backwoods nation is pure balderdash. Good day  |
Date: 8/29/2002 1:06:00 PM
From Authorid: 8184
I heard this but I don't believe they have them.  |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 1:07:00 PM
From Authorid: 55653
Okay First Of All If Iraq Does Fire Nukes They Can Fire Intercaepter Missles To Hit It Before It Reaches A City And Iraq Said There MAKING IT But Didint Say There Complete So If The U.S Attacks Soon They Can Stop Production. |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 3:19:00 PM
From Authorid: 11528
Hi Donno, If Saddam has built 7 new palaces since histilities ended in 1991 then rest assured that they too have been inspected since the inspectors had many years to conduct thier inspections. True the Iraqi soldiers took luxury cars and looted banks during thier brief stay in Kuwait but they justified that because of the oil that was drained off from Iraqi reserves in Kuwait slant drilling operations. Raped torure and murder of Kuwaiti men women and children. Hogwash. If that was the case it would have been well played up in the Media which it wasnt. Were it true then Congressmen wouldnt have been hesitant and reluctant to go to war. As it turned out they had to dress up an 8 year old girl and have her appear before congress and tll her harrowing tale of how the Iraqi soldiers came in and tossed babies on the floors in the hospitals so that they could steal the incubators. That my friend was the turning point. Congress was so moved by her tale of woe that they voted in favour of war. It wasnt until later that the truth came out. The 8 year old girl hadnt been in a Kuwaiti hospital at all. She was the neice of the Ambassador from Kuwait and she had been in the states all during that time. Kuwaitis were not killed tortured and raped, that is a blatant lie. Were that true we would still be hearing about it.The US Govt. would be using that for justification to go to war but I dont hear Your Govt. saying that to her allies. As for the old myth about Gassing his own people. I suggest You read my story from yesterday. Your own Govt. documents confirm that it was the Iranians who gassed those people and it happenned by mistake. Saddam had nothing to do with it. Donno, if ya want to go to war go ahead. Send You brothers and sisters and sons and daughters. You must be happy cause Bush confirmed to the Israelis that they will attack before end of November. Its a mistake though. You might take out the moderate Saddam but all the other Arab nations who are more fundamentalist will think they are next and will group together. Then Your going to have a real enemy on Your hands and You can be sure it wont be long before they arm themselves with Nukes. Yep You may win the war in Iraq but Your going to have a much more farsome enemy when its over and they are going to be very upset. Not to mention China, India, Russia, and Europe. Go ahead, take Saddams oil fields, kill him while Your at it, heck kill all the people too. But Im telling ya its a mistake with grave consequences. Bye for now. Enki |
Date: 8/29/2002 3:24:00 PM
From Authorid: 48525
The US gov't is using this as a scare tactic/rationalization to begin attacks on Iraq. I am no fan of Saddam, but this premis that the US gov't is working under ( "They MIGHT get nuclear capabilities, so kill them all now...)is a unadulterated load of crap. Many nations MIGHT get nuclear capabilities...do we attack them as well???  |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 3:34:00 PM
From Authorid: 11528
Hi Donno,,, time released checmicals to mix with the oil. Thats a new one, You should write for CNN cause nowhere have I ever read that one. Gee isnt it odde that none of the french soldiers report Gulf war syndrome, how odd, they never took those untested innoculations like the US soldiers and British soldiers. You dont suppose it was those untested innoculations do You. The top Iraqi scientist defected to the US, so what. He claims Saddam was just months from having a nuclear weapon. Hogwash. Teams of inspectors have been everywhere in Iraq for 7 1/2 years. They found nothing cause there was nothing to find. I suspect that the top Iraqi scientist reported that to TV to please his new hosts in his new country. Its called propaganda. You mention backwards nation. How odd, just prior to Bush Sr. turning on Iraq;Iraq was being considerd for elevation to first world status. If they are now third world status it is because of Britain and the US bombing them back to that status. But be happy Donno, The oil companies want control of those oil fields and by golly Georgie Jr. is gonna use your armed forcs to get it for them irregardless of how many of your sons and brothers have to die to get them. Bye for now. Enki |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 4:09:00 PM
From Authorid: 28363
hehee, now thats the Enki I remember very good reply. I said i don't want them bombed-- just inspected -- Enki what you don't know is that the talk of war-- makes them more likely to acquiese to the mandates of the charter they had to sign when they lost the desert storm war. There is not going to be an invasion, because the Saudi's are going to make Sadaam allow inspections. |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 7:03:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
I'm sorry... but NO ONE really knows what they have or don't have. They haven't exactly been an unhostile country. I will never trust that they don't have terribe intentions toward the U.S. and Isreal. Never. |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 7:07:00 PM
From Authorid: 34487
It's funny how after 9-11 everyone believed that Sadam couldn't have taken any part in planning or knowing about the attacks due to the difference of religion. This isn't a very intelligent idea, considering Osama and Sadam have one huge thing in common... they both despise the U.S. |
Date: 8/29/2002 10:20:00 PM
From Authorid: 9713
We wont be less alert...Deterrance is the only thing keeping us from all destroying ourselves...  |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 10:22:00 PM
From Authorid: 9713
Do you seriously think the govt. is going to go out and say...Yeah, they have bombs, we could all die? Think about it... |
|
Date: 8/29/2002 10:32:00 PM
From Authorid: 9713
And another thing...I dont think the only thing we should be worried about is nuclear weapons. No type of BMD can protect us from planes running into buildings killing thousands. We need to figure out a way to create peace. |
|
Date: 8/30/2002 12:47:00 PM
From Authorid: 28363
Hijacker Boasted of Sept. 11 Attacks...In another development in the war on terrorism, German prosecutors said the man who flew the second plane into the World Trade Center had picked his target at least 17 months earlier...Prosecutors said that as early as the fall of 1999, he and others in the German city of Hamburg were plotting to attack the United States, reflecting the elaborate planning of the al Qaeda network. They said Marwan al-Sheehi had boasted of the attack in April of 2000 before leaving Hamburg for flight training in the United States. Prosecutor Kay Nehm said al-Sheehi referred to the World Trade Center in telling an unnamed librarian "there will be thousands of dead. You will all think of me." As the anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks nears, authorities have yet to provide a complete and cogent picture of all that was involved, including who helped pay for it and what action, if any, will be taken against them. |
Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization
