|
|
Date: 10/8/2010 9:44:00 AM
From Authorid: 63026
I remember reading this and wasn't this on tv? It's a shame that we can be fooled by this |
Date: 10/8/2010 2:10:00 PM ( Admin )
I don't see anything wrong in adding in created scenes and sounds to make the experience complete if you have no alternative. If it is as realistic or nearly realistic as it can be. If the drops of water would have sounded the same if they were filming it 2 feet in front of the bear. However, to harm another animal in the process to create realism then they have gone too far. Their purpose was not entirely for realism it was to make money, keep their job or someother personal justification which they gained from. People make bad choices and they never realize the harm they have done usually. Some, like Chris feel pain of knowing things that he feels bad about. Did Chris have them remove the water sounds? Telling on the industry is a sign of pain or a desire to make more money on the book. What are his motives? Unknown, but everyone has to figure it all out and make judgements about it. -Rad. |
Date: 10/9/2010 8:48:00 AM From Authorid: 3680 I always wondered why I never saw anything in all my years playing in the woods...makes sense though. Throwing the animals off the cliff though, that's just insane and cruel. |
Renasoft is the proud sponsor of the Unsolved Mystery Publications website.
See: www.rensoft.com Personal Site server, Power to build Personal Web Sites and Personal Web Pages
All stories are copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form, except by specific written authorization