Date: 6/17/2002 11:27:00 PM
From Authorid: 16845
well it's debate so you can't delete sorry I'm in an odd mood tonight hmmmmmmm are you saying...say i have a brother who did horrible things...is put on death row...and i need a kidney yet hes the only relative who matches my type and can donate. so HE donates an kidney I live he goes back to jail and all? is that what you mean? they already do that there was a story a few years ago of a father doing that for his daughter no I don't have problems with them doing that I will tell you I have problems with the death penalty though but that's a whole nother debate in itself LOL |
Date: 6/17/2002 11:34:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 48129
Becky, =-p, LoL, nooo, please lets not go into the dealth penalty debate, lol well we could actually, im not sleepy right now, lol |
Date: 6/17/2002 11:55:00 PM
From Authorid: 28193
Yes, I believe that it's ok, if it's the only choice that you had. |
Date: 6/18/2002 12:09:00 AM
From Authorid: 7830
I think whatever the inmate wants to do in that situation is up to them. |
Date: 6/18/2002 12:16:00 AM
From Authorid: 55066
Death penalty is a scary reality in this world today, and I'm so happy to live in a country where it doesn't exist.. errr.. that was not the question was it? I think it would be ok, why deny that inmate to perform a last good deed? Just my two cents.. Take Care / Clouded |
Date: 6/18/2002 12:19:00 AM
From Authorid: 22080
i say bring back the roman coliseum and put them all in it |
Date: 6/18/2002 12:50:00 AM
From Authorid: 55194
I think it's ok. They took someone's life and then through an organ donation, they give someone else life. ~Avar Merithien |
Date: 6/18/2002 6:34:00 AM
From Authorid: 25438
OK I was gonna comment, but I am afraid that you will get "p'oed" so nevermind |
Date: 6/18/2002 6:43:00 AM
From Authorid: 19345
I think what it comes down to is no matter what a person does and is in jail they have the right to be treated humanely no matter what. Thats what makes us supposeitly different than animals. If the operation would leave them suffering like if you took their kidneys and they couldn'tlive I would say no its inlhumane to make them suffer but maybe their could be a method of exuction that would leave the organs in tact where they could be used. They have the right I think to do one good thing before they leave,no? |
Date: 6/18/2002 3:41:00 PM
From Authorid: 22080
sluggo the human race is an animal |
Date: 6/18/2002 4:01:00 PM
From Authorid: 3321
Unless they sign a release WILLINGLY, then I find it preposterously and disgustingly unethical. |
Date: 6/18/2002 10:25:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 48129
LoL, BlueKnight, you are entitled to your opinion, what i meant by being "po'ed" is if anyone says anything inappropriate and ends up causing this post to be deleted and i have to end up rewriting it, I then would be po'ed...get it? lol |
Date: 6/18/2002 10:26:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 48129
Of course Persphone, its something that has to be willingly. Even though they may be inmates, they still have decision on what they do with their bodies. |
Date: 6/18/2002 10:27:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 48129
Sluggo, you wouldnt be able to take BOTH kidneys, lol If someone donates a kidney or a piece of their liver, they can survive and lead a normal life and not suffer. |
Date: 6/19/2002 8:51:00 AM
From Authorid: 54987
The idea of death row donors is fine as long as the death row inmate has the choice. There is another problem though. No one I think would like to know that they have the heart, kidney, liver, of a murderer inside them - even if it saves their life. Maybe it's OK for their family, but strangers no unless it's anonymous. It would be like the murderer is living through you. That's just my opinion and how I would feel. :¬ |
Date: 6/19/2002 6:30:00 PM ( From Author )
From Authorid: 48129
Well author 54987, the death row inmate would ONLY be able to donate to family, the best match would be WITH the family, not complete strangers and of course it would be with permission, LoL |